Royal Commentators, reporters and authors

[wannable]

In reference to the next royal book, Omid has updated the launch date from Summer to Fall (Autumn)

Omid Scobie
@scobie
ENDGAME Out Fall


^ Autumn
Sat, Sep 23, 2023 - Thu, Dec 21, 2023

*****

Previously:



*****

California visit, 6th June, multiple pictures
Instagram, Omid's official account: scobiesnaps

[wannable]

Omid Scobie
@scobie

I have book news!

#ENDGAME, a penetrating investigation into the future of the Royal Family, will be released globally on November 21, 2023. Can?t wait for you all to read this.

More details, and preorder links, at http://readendgame.com

On September 8, 2022, the world stood still as news broke of Queen Elizabeth II's passing. Her death dismantled the protective shield around the world's most famous family and saw a long-simmering crisis of confidence in the British monarchy begin to resurface. Now, with unique insight, deep access and exclusive revelations, journalist Omid Scobie pulls back the curtain on an institution in turmoil?exposing the chaos, family dysfunction, distrust and draconian practices threatening its very future. This is the monarchy's endgame. Do they have what it takes to save it?

[wannable]

Tom Bower last night interview with GB News:

Meghan Markle speaks to Diana beyond the grave according to one of Harry's friends that told him.

Harry will have a 'token' win vs the Mirror because the BRF never loses. He alleges that the token will be similar to Meghan's token win vs the Daily Mail in ref to her daddy letter.

[Curryong]

Tom Bower last night interview with GB News:

Meghan Markle speaks to Diana beyond the grave according to one of Harry's friends that told him.

Harry will have a 'token' win vs the Mirror because the BRF never loses. He alleges that the token will be similar to Meghan's token win vs the Daily Mail in ref to her daddy letter.

It wasn?t a token win when three appeal Court judges ruled that her letter was private and not a matter of public interest. It?s often forgotten that the DM were in the end forced to pay the majority of Meghan?s costs as a result of that copyright breach.. Bower is a barrister but unsurprisingly seems to have ?forgotten? that part.

Meghan Markle awarded 1 pound privacy damages, much more for copyright

And so Bower, never having met Meghan in his life, scrapes up info like that about speaking to Diana? Third hand at least. Very viable I?m sure, lol!

[Curryong]

Meghan Markle wins privacy case against Mail: How did it happen - The Economic Times

[wannable]

^ More known worldwide of Omid and Meghan lying to  a court of law.

****

Neil Sean claimed last night that Harry has reached out to William in reference of his interest in W Homeward Homeless project, offering his help. A developing story, Neil will be reporting whatever happens/response W side if any.

[TLLK]

^^^ Hi @wannable-Do you have a link to Neal Sean's claim about Prince Harry and Prince William's Homeward project? Was it on his social media?

[sara8150]

'Harry and Meghan's business affairs likely to be dished out in Omid Scobie's new book - not Royals' | Daily Mail Online

Omid Scobie delays publication of 'Endgame' to include details on the Coronation | Daily Mail Online

Harry and Meghan's cheerleader Omid Scobie announces new book 'Endgame' | Daily Mail Online

New royal book dismissed as 'sensational attempt to cash in on Sussexes' rift with Firm' | Royal | News | Express.co.uk

Meghan and Harry 'assumed to have approved' Omid Scobie's new bombshell royal book | Royal | News | Express.co.uk

Harry and Meghan's pal teases bombshell book inside Royal Family's 'fight for survival' | Royal | News | Express.co.uk

I can?t believe Omid Scobie did tell all on books and more embarrassed on royal family and Sussex im not approved with his books!! He admit tell all about royal family not OKAY!! Kept private  :thumbsdown: :ugh:

[wannable]

I have a feeling this book will be his own end game and his California sources.

[wannable]

Finding Freedom was notably favourable towards the Sussexes and written from their perspective. Endgame is expected to be similar, and Mr Scobie has admitted that he has spent time in California while working on the book.

By Victoria Ward,
ROYAL EDITOR
28 June 2023 ? 8:49pm
The Telegraph

Bingo!

Archive PHP is illegal for ''distribution'', only 'self download'. It's piracy when dealing with pay per view. Just in Case.

[sara8150]

By Victoria Ward,
ROYAL EDITOR
28 June 2023 ? 8:49pm
The Telegraph

Bingo!

Archive PHP is illegal for ''distribution'', only 'self download'. It's piracy when dealing with pay per view. Just in Case.

I?m agreed with you

[sara8150]

I have a feeling this book will be his own end game and his California sources.

Yes

[wannable]

Byline Investigates write under anonymous team Byline Investigates, one of the journalists was mentioned today in Court. 

IMO, Andrew Green has the list of journalists who work for Byline Investigates, who were jobless after the Leveson.

[Curryong]

Byline Investigates write under anonymous team Byline Investigates, one of the journalists was mentioned today in Court. 

IMO, Andrew Green has the list of journalists who work for Byline Investigates, who were jobless after the Leveson.

There were many so-called tabloid journalists who were jobless after Leveson, and the NOTW debacle, and many more in the industry who should have been, never mind about who is on who?s list or not.

[wannable]

@Curryong Two mentioned at the case, one is an owner, the other writes for it.  When Byline Investigates was created after Leveson, no one knew who they were, they wrote anonymously as ''Team Byline Investigates''.  The disclaimer and their website does not mention who is who.

That the Judge will consider if they are reliable since they pay people to be witnesses against a media oultet, they pay offering book, tv deals....IMO since the owner and one of the writers were mentioned to pay witnesses, the irony of it all, surely the rest of the ''team'' are honorable not. IMO, this will bring about a 'new' case about these people.   So much for complaining of no named sources, these very people wrote anonymously until yesterday.  To be honest, I knew about this since 1 month ago by watching a youtuber who 'held her tongue' but only mentioned Byline as fraudulent and corrupt, with the cryptic of they will be mentioned in H case.

@TLLK 

^^^ Hi @wannable-Do you have a link to Neal Sean's claim about Prince Harry and Prince William's Homeward project? Was it on his social media?

HARRY SET TO REACH OUT FINALLY - WILL IT BE ACCEPTED? #breakingnews #princeharry #royalscandal - YouTube

Neil Sean posts between 6 to 8 short videos ''daily'' 12 midnight British Standard Time.

Sara8150 does a great job posting a gazillion links daily, bless her.  I ''try'' to read them all, but I'm afraid my algorithms are average.  I have a app called Algorithms and Data Structures for ''work'' - certain responsibility for branding and clicks, but I use the app also to check things ''i share'' - how many clicks etc. Sadly no one opens a link, it may mean they trust what I quote, mentioning author full name, date/time, job title, organization the individual works for.  Also hence I know when I open the marvelous Sara8150 daily links, my algo tells me I am ''average''.

[Curryong]

Somebody who works for the media calling other journalists ?fraudulent and corrupt?! That?s the biggest laugh I?ve had all day! The number of journalists who hacked, told lies, made up stories (something that happens regularly today) and wrecked people?s lives in the process, were innumerable.

I have all the sympathy in the world for every one of the plaintiffs in these hacking cases. I hope these newspaper groups continue to pay their victims out in the millions as they have been doing and will no doubt continue to do, regardless of whether Harry wins his case or not. These tabloids and the journalists who work for them are the scum of the earth imo, and there are plenty who agree with me.

[wannable]

Socialite and Author, Lady C  :blowkiss: :D

Now, I will post the link after 48 hours giving our fellow members to check her channel and watch 40plus hours to find what she said 1 month ago about this case, about Byline, and the cryptic of THEY who she also knows the who is who, were to be mentioned.

Youtube is free for everyone, when I mention in my own comment that FULLY NAMED person is stating something, head on to youtube, open the 'latest' chapter and what that person says matches with my comment with a tiny mention (nobody to date has opened a link I posted, my algorithm app is 100% viable) rather than axing on me, very simple 21st century, news and interests are super easy to find in a search engine.  Plus go on and ''subscribe'' to these peoples channel, you'd be surprised they do know a lot of things that turn out to be true. By subscribing you will receive the bells and whistles of an uploaded new royal gossip venture.  :hehe:

@Curryong byline is fraudulent and corrupt and wrote all this time ''anonymously'', something not you particularly BUT many people elsewhere where complaining and moaning about 'no named sources' which IS protected by law in the UK and USA.  So, what I mean to say is many of these people were or still are after knowing their paying corrupt ways cheer for them but boo the royal rota or UK journalists, especially in ref to the Sussexes. The hypocrazy (hypcrisy  :wink: ) and the bias went out of hand yesterday in social media.

[wannable]

''History will judge us'' how Kate took on Harry and Meghan
What was really going on between Harry and William last year? Who was really wielding the power?

While some have attributed ''recollections may vary'' to Alderton, more than one source has said that the author was in fact Jean-Christophe Gray, William's new private secretary, who had been in post for less than three weeks. At least two senior officials in other households were against its inclusion, because they feared that it would rile Harry and Meghan. But once the phrase had been added to the draft, it was  according to another source  the Duchess of Cambridge who pressed home the argument that it should remain. It was Kate who clearly made the point, ''History will judge this statement and unless this phrase or a phrase like it is included, everything that they have said will be taken as true.''
This was, said the source, yet another example of how Kate is often far steelier than she appears. She does not get as much credit as she should, because she is so subtle about it. She is playing the long game. She has always got her eye on, This is my life and my historic path and I am going to be the Queen one day. The toughened-up draft went to Buckingham Palace for approval, and came back a couple of hours later. The Queen had said yes.

Valentine Low
Friday June 30 2023, 5.00pm BST
The Times

^ According to Valentine Low, ''recollections may vary'' is a Kensington Palace thing.  The Times article is very long. 

[wannable]

^ The above paragraph is an extract from Valentine Low's book. Extracted by himself for the paper he works for, The Times. (He extracted a lot)

Video Icon

Extracted from Courtiers: The Hidden Power behind the Crown by Valentine Low, out in paperback on July 6  To order a copy, go to timesbookshop.co.uk or call 020 3176 2935. Free UK standard P&P on orders over 25. Discount available for Times+ members

[HistoryGirl2]

''History will judge us'' how Kate took on Harry and Meghan
What was really going on between Harry and William last year? Who was really wielding the power?

Valentine Low
Friday June 30 2023, 5.00pm BST
The Times

^ According to Valentine Low, ''recollections may vary'' is a Kensington Palace thing.  The Times article is very long.

The person responsible for crafting that phrase was a PR pro. Succinct, classy, but also says exactly what the Palace feel about the lies and misinformation. I really gotta read that book. I?m intrigued by the people behind the strategy of representing the family.

[Curryong]

Why does this phrase about recollections have to be the last word about what occurred between the Sussexes and  other royals? There can be another take on it. Recollections in fact may and do vary.

If you have two or three people present at a debate it can be possible, and often is, that none of the two or three remember a certain incident in exactly the same way. That doesn?t mean that one person hold the truth and nothing but the truth and the other two persons are inevitably liars, especially if there is or has been a quarrel.

Each person has their own recollection and just because one party is able to employ people with slick tongues able to insert their truth into a published statement doesn?t make that statement 100% correct.

History may indeed judge them and that means all parties. It might be good to remember that historians in a hundred years or so may not necessarily come to the conclusions about this split of one brother and his wife from his family that the BRF and their courtiers wish to portray now.

[TLLK]

The person responsible for crafting that phrase was a PR pro. Succinct, classy, but also says exactly what the Palace feel about the lies and misinformation. I really gotta read that book. I?m intrigued by the people behind the strategy of representing the family.

I have to say that it will likely be one of the most memorable phrases associated with the reign of HLM QEII.

[Curryong]

Plus the other portion of this short statement is often forgotten.

This is the statement which was released just before 5.30pm on Tuesday. It said,

?The whole family is saddened to learn the full extent of how challenging the last few years have been for Harry and Meghan. The issues raised, particularly that of race, are concerning. While some recollections may vary, they are taken very seriously and will be addressed by the family privately. Harry, Meghan and Archie will always be much loved family members.?

It?s not the fact that the Queen emphasised that Harry and Meghan had found the years challenging, or that her grandson and his wife will always be loved family members. No no. It?s not that issues raised were concerning and would be taken seriously, addressed privately. No. It?s the five words about recollections that the media concentrated on in that statement and still does. Five words out of that statement.

[TLLK]

^ The above paragraph is an extract from Valentine Low's book. Extracted by himself for the paper he works for, The Times. (He extracted a lot)

Video Icon

Extracted from Courtiers: The Hidden Power behind the Crown by Valentine Low, out in paperback on July 6  To order a copy, go to timesbookshop.co.uk or call 020 3176 2935. Free UK standard P&P on orders over 25. Discount available for Times+ members

That's one of the longest excerpts from a book that I've ever seen released. I had a feeling that Valentine Low would add an additional chapter regarding the late QEII's death and KCIII's ascension.

[TLLK]

The person responsible for crafting that phrase was a PR pro. Succinct, classy, but also says exactly what the Palace feel about the lies and misinformation. I really gotta read that book. I?m intrigued by the people behind the strategy of representing the family.

I read it and found it to be very well researched.