A New Chapter Part 8

Started by wannable, June 13, 2022, 03:10:40 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

Curryong

Quote from: wannable on September 16, 2022, 03:02:02 PM
After all the trashing Harry did, knowing most of what he and his wife have said are lies, running to the media to run his mouth about his own family.  He will have to bare with all the bad press when it comes his way. 

So it may be true, tantrum 👶🏻

Oh well, if the media says it?s true then it must be, 100%! It?s very funny that when commentators like Morgan and others were saying that Harry ought to be able to wear a uniform that the media, who always claim that they know EVERYTHING that everyone in the RF say, do and think, didn?t pick up on that ?fact? until today. Weird, that, lol!

wannable

#226
You've stated 9/10 times that you dislike Piers Morgan.

Anyway the majority of the media, including BBC said Harry had a tantrum. (He can sue them all)

wannable

Now the media live is saying that Harry asked his father what can I do, it's complicated because he isn't a working royal, basically a former royal.

Quite sad, maybe King Charles will accept 21st century part timers? IMO it would be possible with a NDA to not commercialize make moneys speaking about BRF members. They'd probably have to delete everything mentioning Netflix, Spotify and the Book.

Curryong

Quote from: wannable on September 16, 2022, 03:12:07 PM
You've stated 9/10 times that you dislike Piers Morgan.

Anyway the majority of the media, including BBC said Harry had a tantrum. (He can sue them all)

Well they?ve done a switch from a couple of days ago then, when they were all up in arms about how unfair it was, lol! The media play round and round the mulberry bush with these reports. One outlet starts, the rest follow. And that includes BBC royal correspondents.

I mention Morgan (whom I loathe) because it was/is highly unusual for him to say ANYTHING in Harry/Meghan?s favour EVER. There were plenty of commentators and journalists saying the same thing.
Would you have preferred me to have stated it just came from Omid Scobie, lol!

Curryong

Quote from: wannable on September 16, 2022, 03:17:39 PM
Now the media live is saying that Harry asked his father what can I do, it's complicated because he isn't a working royal, basically a former royal.

Quite sad, maybe King Charles will accept 21st century part timers? IMO it would be possible with a NDA to not commercialize make moneys speaking about BRF members. They'd probably have to delete everything mentioning Netflix, Spotify and the Book.

How can a King?s son be a former royal? The Duke of Windsor was a former King but abdication didn?t make him a former royal.

And I often think that leaping on media reports about what people in the ranks of the RF are going to do, say or act, is a forlorn exercise, simply because the RF and their Press Offices only throw certain titbits at the media to see if they stick and most of the time the media, including the RRs, don?t know anything. That?s why some of them resort to gossip from aides and servants. I?ll wait for official announcements in preference after 50 years of listening and reading the BS and having a chuckle.

wannable

I'm just a messenger, three screens at my home office desk (it grew massively from the pandemic, I own 1/3, the office 2/3) 1 screen office, 2 screens with BBC and the other Sky...repeating what the anchors are saying.



wannable

I wonder if it will set a precedent.  Every very special occasion the non working royal is invited to attend, and working royals using uniform?!

Curryong

This would have filled a hole in guests? tummies on Harry and Meghan?s wedding day. A mix of English and Scottish food for the most part.

Finding Freedom, written by Omid Scobie and Carolyn Durand, notes that guests were served canapes of "Scottish langoustines wrapped in smoked salmon with citrus cr?me fraiche, grilled English asparagus wrapped in Cumbrian ham, garden pea panna cotta with quail eggs and lemon verbena, and poached free-range chicken bound with a lightly spiced yogurt with roasted apricot".

The lunch then included "fricassee of free-range chicken with morel mushrooms and young leeks; pea and mint risotto with pea shoots, truffle oil, and Parmesan crisps; and ten-hour slow-roasted Windsor pork belly with apple compote and crackling".

wannable

Concessions to keep the peace for the Queen:

Apparently the Sussexes have been invited to Sunday's reception.

It will be interesting if in weeks, months the couple won't trash the family anymore?! Until Wednesday 7th of September (one day before the passing away of HMQEII) they were trashing daily! (Dan Wootton has the bullet list from Spotify to The Cut to their friend Omid).

LouisFerdinand

Have Meghan's royal diaries been stolen?


Curryong

 Severe critic of Meghan Markle for years, the disgraceful Angela Levin,  got some of her own medicine during a TV interview, Newsweek reports

Then royal biographer Angela Levin was confronted on Talk TV, where Morgan is a presenter, about years of criticism of Harry and Meghan.

Host Vanessa Feltz told her: "Do you feel any guilt? Do you feel that you have been responsible for fueling a kind of anti-Meghan faction that has been spiteful and targeting and possibly fanciful as well. Quite a lot of what's been said about her has been pretty much manufactured anyway."

Levin later told Newsweek: "I don't think that her [Feltz's] behavior went with being an interviewer. She was very aggressive and determined to try and squash me."

Piers Morgan Backs Harry on Uniform Despite Years Tormenting Meghan

Curryong

Quote from: wannable on September 16, 2022, 07:42:29 PM
Concessions to keep the peace for the Queen:

Apparently the Sussexes have been invited to Sunday's reception.

It will be interesting if in weeks, months the couple won't trash the family anymore?! Until Wednesday 7th of September (one day before the passing away of HMQEII) they were trashing daily! (Dan Wootton has the bullet list from Spotify to The Cut to their friend Omid).

Does Wootton have a bullet list from 2018 to today consisting of his own attacks on Meghan and Harry, beginning with the lies in the Sun under his editorship for which the tabloid had to apologise, about staff parking spaces near FC?  Because that bullet list would stretch for about a kilometre if not more!

wannable

I gather he does have it, these attacks always have a discovered new thing like a registration of a name with a certain someone in Delaware, and the sort. He?s not the only one, Tom Bower is better with receipts.


wannable

^ I thought it weird, when the only one who had tweeted the invite was Omid (and then the only made article was the Express, like really buried down and copy pasting Omid's tweet), hence my previous comment of the invitation. Then I did read the Telegraph article today early in the morning that it isn't true, they were not brutal in the wording, just stating that the Montecito Communications are confused.

Here is Omid's tweet 22 hours ago.

Omid Scobie
@scobie

22h
𝐋𝐀𝐓𝐄𝐒𝐓: On Sunday, King Charles will host world leaders, diplomats and international royals at a historic state reception at Buckingham Palace on the eve of the Queen?s funeral. Senior royal family members, including Duke and Duchess of Sussex, have been invited to join.

sara8150

Quote from: wannable on September 17, 2022, 12:46:16 PM
^ I thought it weird, when the only one who had tweeted the invite was Omid (and then the only made article was the Express, like really buried down and copy pasting Omid's tweet), hence my previous comment of the invitation. Then I did read the Telegraph article today early in the morning that it isn't true, they were not brutal in the wording, just stating that the Montecito Communications are confused.

Here is Omid's tweet 22 hours ago.

Omid Scobie
@scobie

22h
𝐋𝐀𝐓𝐄𝐒𝐓: On Sunday, King Charles will host world leaders, diplomats and international royals at a historic state reception at Buckingham Palace on the eve of the Queen?s funeral. Senior royal family members, including Duke and Duchess of Sussex, have been invited to join.

King Charles makes decisions to host world leaders and European royals to attend at Buckingham Palace out his hands is ties not my decisions its his decisions he become King he learned from his mother the Queen Elizabeth II when late Queen Elizabeth II was in charge she invite world leaders and European royals who not work royals not invite end of discussion because Harry and Andrew no longer work because Andrew still investigation on disgrace Jeffrey Epstein Harry resignation his royal work and senior royal family plus bombshell interview on national television embarrassed his father and his brother but Harry plans to publish his books but halt till next year due death of HM Queen Elizabeth II as moderator for Sussex will not happened again 

wannable

Meghan Markle & Prince Harry Dump US-Based PR Firm Who Helped Extract Them From British Royals In Wake Of Queen Elizabeth's Death

There might be another reason Meghan Markle is agreeing to stay in the United Kingdom besides for Queen Elizabeth's funeral. RadarOnline.com has confirmed the unpopular Duchess of Sussex and her husband, Prince Harry, have severed ties with their United States PR firm, with Sunshine Sachs telling us "we no longer work" with the exiled royals.

This comes after an anonymous tipster claimed "Meghan and Harry are no longer" with the PR firm, adding "intel is solid!" We did some digging and Meghan no longer hawks the high-profile firm on her Celebrity Service account. The website provides a treasure trove of information, taking pride in "providing accurate and up-to-date contact information" on all of Hollywood's hottest stars.

Meghan Markle & Prince Harry Dump US-Based PR Firm

TLLK

@wannable-I recall that you mentioned in an earlier post that there were rumors that the couple had parted ways with SS but now the PR firm has confirmed that they're no longer representing the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. I believe that Meghan had worked with them for years while she was a member of the Suits cast.

Curryong

#244
Different strokes for different strokes here!

https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/royals/meghan-markle-receives-hate-while-prince-andrew-gets-away-with-it/news-story/3ea08c89bc6d2a5d8eb66a7cecad1f9c

?But while Markle has stepped away from the royals to embrace sunny weather and podcasting, in Prince Andrew?s case, he has been away from his royal duties because he settled a civil sex abuse case over allegations that he sexually assaulted Virginia Giuffre when she was only 17.

Prince Andrew has repeatedly and strongly denying all the claims against him.

That settlement meant Prince Andrew had to give up his public life because he became a disgrace. The Queen stripped her second son of his royal patronages, honorary military titles, and his official use of his HRH style in a bid to distance the institution of the monarchy from the case.

In comparison, Markle?s greatest crime is that she left the royal family to seek freedom from the rules of a rigid Monarchy.?

wannable

Quote from: TLLK on September 17, 2022, 01:23:36 PM
@wannable-I recall that you mentioned in an earlier post that there were rumors that the couple had parted ways with SS but now the PR firm has confirmed that they're no longer representing the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. I believe that Meghan had worked with them for years while she was a member of the Suits cast.


It was a rumour but it seems to be true now.  She didn't get rid of them (she still has a handful of employees from when she was single) when she got engaged to Harry, hence my jest in their UK engagement thread that I predict the couple will be staying in the UK for a long time, half a year? I don't know, the wink wink, LOL is exactly that.

Curryong

#246
Quote from: sara8150 on September 17, 2022, 12:39:11 PM
Harry and Meghan have been 'uninvited to state reception at Buckingham Palace' | Daily Mail Online
For work royals only to invite only but Harry and Andrew not invite for reception

Wannable was the only one to mention this invite on the forum. My only comment on it when she did (and I believe it to be true) was that Harry wouldn?t be bothered. That in fact the thing paramount in his mind (and in Meghan?s) is the reunion with his children in California after the funeral.

wannable

Quote from: Curryong on September 17, 2022, 01:23:54 PM
Different strokes for different strokes here!

https://www.news.com.au/entertainment/celebrity-life/royals/meghan-markle-receives-hate-while-prince-andrew-gets-away-with-it/news-story/3ea08c89bc6d2a5d8eb66a7cecad1f9c

?But while Markle has stepped away from the royals to embrace sunny weather and podcasting, in Prince Andrew?s case, he has been away from his royal duties because he settled a civil sex abuse case over allegations that he sexually assaulted Virginia Giuffre when she was only 17.

Prince Andrew has repeatedly and strongly denying all the claims against him.

That settlement meant Prince Andrew had to give up his public life because he became a disgrace. The Queen stripped her second son of his royal patronages, honorary military titles, and his official use of his HRH style in a bid to distance the institution of the monarchy from the case.

In comparison, Markle?s greatest crime is that she left the royal family to seek freedom from the rules of a rigid Monarchy.?

Her greatest crime is TRASHING THE BRF and she still did until Wednesday 7th September, hours before the Queen's death!  No one will forget that.

wannable

#248
Quote from: Curryong on September 17, 2022, 01:31:06 PM
Wannabie was the only one to mention this invite on the forum. My only comment on it when she did (and I believe it to be true) was that Harry wouldn?t be bothered. That in fact the thing paramount in his mind (and in Meghan?s) is the reunion with his children in California after the funeral.

It is known that Omid is the Sussexes friend, he can't deny it ever again, the court case showed 30 emails more than 2 dozen whatsapp messages. He was the only one to post, tweet it, result: one media publication did an article referring to HIS tweet.  The Express covered their backs, just in case measure, as it should be.

For what it's worth, I am going to keep posting in the forum Omid's tweets for entertainment purposes, very likely in the ''Royal Commentators'' thread  :blank:

Curryong

As for predicting a long stay in the UK for the Sussexes,  in fact Harry did say when they left in 2019 that they will be back in the UK for certain periods of time during the years to come. He reiterated this some months later when he said that if it hadn?t been for Covid they would have been back before. That was in 2020.