The Duke and Duchess of Sussex interviews, TV and other media events Part 2

Started by Curryong, July 10, 2020, 11:56:09 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 ... 8 9 10 ... 15
User actions

PrincessOfPeace

#200
April 20, 2022, 06:05:51 PM
Couldn't even say he missed his brother and father.

Amabel2

#201
April 20, 2022, 07:01:06 PM
He has to concentrate on teh queen.  He probalby has very cautious limited contact with his father and brother, and Harry knows that to criticise his elderly grandmother would look really bad, so he wants to say that he's still on good terms with her

wannable

#203
April 20, 2022, 07:25:58 PM
Harry wants the media to question his dad and brother.  By stating that he is the Queens confidant, that he wants to make sure the Queen is surrounded by good people and protected.  Indirectly or directly he is saying that the Queen is moaning to him things that she doesn't moan to the POW and DOC.  That she feels unprotected and surrounded by bad people.  IT IS NO WONDER SHE TOOK OFF TO SANDRINGHAM.  He did it again!!!

Who do you think is Harry's target by steering and stating more crap.

TLLK

#204
April 20, 2022, 07:32:43 PM
The Prime Minister's official spokesperson states that they're confident regarding HM's well being.

Number 10 hits back at Harry's claims he is 'making sure the Queen is protected' | Daily Mail Online

QuotePrince Harry's claims he has made sure the Queen is 'protected' was rebuffed by No 10 today - who said the PM was confident about her current welfare arrangements.

Downing Street brushed off the Duke's concerns that Her Majesty may not be being properly looked after.

The Prime Minister's official spokesman said he was confident she was - despite Harry's surprising comments.

wannable

#206
April 20, 2022, 07:44:33 PM
Quote from: TLLK on April 20, 2022, 07:32:43 PM
The Prime Minister's official spokesperson states that they're confident regarding HM's well being.

Number 10 hits back at Harry's claims he is 'making sure the Queen is protected' | Daily Mail Online

He thinks granny is being manipulated.  Everyone IS making conclusions with his statement (s) which at the end, the intention is to offend.

Amabel2

#207
April 20, 2022, 07:47:22 PM
I doubt if he thinks that at all.  He is just pushing this narrative that he is still great freinds with the queen.. and that if he has to stay away, it is because of the evil courtiers or his fear that he will not have proper security in the UK.  Strange that he was able to go to Netherlands and to clal in and see the queen on the way

Curryong

#208
April 21, 2022, 04:09:15 AM Last Edit: April 21, 2022, 04:23:51 AM by Curryong
Quote from: wannable on April 20, 2022, 07:25:58 PM
Harry wants the media to question his dad and brother.  By stating that he is the Queens confidant, that he wants to make sure the Queen is surrounded by good people and protected.  Indirectly or directly he is saying that the Queen is moaning to him things that she doesn't moan to the POW and DOC.  That she feels unprotected and surrounded by bad people.  IT IS NO WONDER SHE TOOK OFF TO SANDRINGHAM.  He did it again!!!

Who do you think is Harry's target by steering and stating more crap.

That?s your interpretation of what was said. Harry didn?t mention his father or brother in connection with the Queen?s security. Of course he?s good friends with his grandmother. And he met Charles and Camilla when at Windsor.

Who he isn?t good friends with are many of the courtiers and most of the British media. The latter have leaped onto one tiny bit of this US interview and torn it to shreds, in the hope of getting yet more controversial H+M traction going.

After all, this has been a very successful Invictus Games, and Harry and Meghan?s presence there made headlines around the world. That interview was 99% cheerful talk from Harry about the IG, the competitors and his family life in California.

That?s not good news for Angela Levin and the rest of the Press pack of scavengers, the so-called ?Royal experts?, who have used the last three years to constantly and consistently attack Harry and Meghan in every way possible.

The belief now is that H+M and possibly their children will be on the BP balcony for the Jubilee celebrations (and for the Commemorative service for the Queen?s reign at St Paul?s as well.) invitations from Harry?s grandmother herself in fact.  That shock is what has made anti Sussex commenters everywhere grizzle into their morning gruel over the last 48 hours..

wannable

#209
April 21, 2022, 01:21:44 PM Last Edit: April 21, 2022, 01:26:08 PM by wannable
The 'courtiers', the old and trusted (fact from companies worldwide) the employee gets the blame, never the employer. Collateral damage is always the small person; the servant.  It washed 30 years ago, today it doesn't. Many things have changed in the HR department and with the 99% of the world population in re to the 1%.  Harry doesn't care about privilege, he still to date loves to blame all of his own misgivings left right and center to a 3rd party.  HE was the one who went running to a TV station, not the Queen, not Charles! Giving this man child more excuses is really pathetic.

Harry's position within the BRF at 4000 miles versus HM children, some of them who visit her daily!

Quote
Patricia Treble
@PatriciaTreble

The main interview started at 7:32 am and was ~11 minutes long (plus  a 2 min chat among host after it ended)

Of those ~11 minutes, 2:35 min were on the Invictus Games while the rest ? ~8:25 min ? were on his family including the Queen, his mother, wife and children

wannable

#210
April 21, 2022, 01:31:42 PM
Some headlines

Quote
Charles is 'at the end of his tether' over Harry: Royal experts reveal Prince's concern over 'loose cannon' son 'blurting' claims about 'protecting' the Queen

Quote
Taking aim at the family he owes his fortune to... the barbs that stunned the Palace: Prince Harry's swipes at the royals in his latest tell-all on American TV

Quote
So who are the 'right' people, Harry? Bemused royal watchers joke Oprah, Ellen DeGeneres and Elton John could 'protect' Queen - amid claims Prince aimed veiled dig at private secretary Sir Edward Young and dockworker's daughter Angela Kelly

Curryong

#211
April 21, 2022, 02:45:30 PM Last Edit: April 21, 2022, 02:47:40 PM by Curryong
Sir Edward Young has been characterised by several broadsheet journalists as an absolute disaster as the Queen?s PS since he took over after Charles and Andrew insisted that there be a reshuffle years ago. Christopher Geidt handled things so much better.

wannable

#212
April 21, 2022, 03:23:40 PM
In a court of law employee vs employer, in this case, employee can't be faulted because of a Rogue Grandson 'own doings'.

The elder generation must learn this the hard way, William is the only one who sees that the sky is gray when it's about his brother (and sister in law).

Curryong

#213
April 21, 2022, 04:28:04 PM
Quote from: wannable on April 21, 2022, 03:23:40 PM
In a court of law employee vs employer, in this case, employee can't be faulted because of a Rogue Grandson 'own doings'.

The elder generation must learn this the hard way, William is the only one who sees that the sky is gray when it's about his brother (and sister in law).

Well, William may well not be King for another twenty years. And the Queen isn?t an employee of a company. She is a much respected and admired monarch. And Harry is her beloved grandson.

wannable

#214
April 21, 2022, 05:26:16 PM Last Edit: April 21, 2022, 05:38:30 PM by wannable
You mentioned the employee. I'm just replying, the BRF as employer (now a days) have to document why they would make redundant an employee.  It's in the UK labour law, the royals were practically exempt 30 years ago.  Hence the bullying thing will probably be shut forever and forgotten, private compensations (at least to 4 employees)

Harry's board/thread: the PS isn't responsible for Harry's own reckless doings. 30 years ago for sure.

Also, the PS can't be blamed for this meeting fiasco, that ended on US national TV.  Harry's camp said the meeting was arranged in '''secret''' with the Q and C. 

The Q took off to Sandringham
C is said to be at the end of his tether.   

The only good thing I can say about the Q and C who fell into this trap, is they had 'hope' of Harry, which he completely destroyed.

Curryong

#216
April 24, 2022, 12:42:38 AM Last Edit: April 24, 2022, 12:47:07 AM by Curryong
Everyone knows the Queen hates a fuss ? except, strangely, her most loyal defenders | Marina Hyde | The Guardian

Not only did Harry later reveal that he and his grandmother had had a good-humoured tea ? decried as oversharing by the sort of former aides who lucratively betrayed all his mother?s secrets ? but he explained he?d been ?making sure that she?s protected and got the right people around her?. Can?t be sure what he?s on about. Perhaps he saw the Queen being walked to her Westminster Abbey seat at Prince Philip?s memorial by the Duke of York, about 10 minutes after she?d forked out for some of his multimillion-dollar sex assault case settlement, and wondered if she was being advised by some kind of paedo Oliver Cromwell.

Like all truly patriotic Britons, I hugely enjoy how mad Prince Harry makes some people. Mad in both the British and American senses of the word. More than two years after he stepped back from royal duties to become yet another boring Californian, seemingly every?

Amabel2

#217
April 24, 2022, 11:02:28 AM
Why do you admire Harry for being divisive?  he has left the RF,  and can now lead a private life.. so why does he continue to talk about his family and stir up disputing?

Curryong

#218
April 24, 2022, 12:11:09 PM
Quote from: Amabel2 on April 24, 2022, 11:02:28 AM
Why do you admire Harry for being divisive?  he has left the RF,  and can now lead a private life.. so why does he continue to talk about his family and stir up disputing?

As I stated on a previous post the interview on US TV was 99% Harry talking about Invictus and his life in California with his family. He was asked a couple of questions about the Queen etc and he answered them. The way the British tabloids react if he had said nothing he would have been accused of hiding things about what she and his grandmother had spoken about. There is always something for them to moan about where the Sussexes are concerned.

Harry was cheerful in this interview after a very successful IG. Because the Press can?t gloat about him being snubbed by the Dutch royals (he wasn?t) or slammed for presiding over a failure of a Games the British media has decided to concentrate on two sentences in a broad ranging interview and gnaw at it like a dog with a bone.

As for being divisive, are the British tabloids and innumerable commentators not divisive in constantly discussing Harry?s relations with his family? They are practically weeping now because they can?t hit him with a stick any more that he hasn?t seen his aged grandmother, that he and his family (contrary to their confident predictions) will probably get a Jubilee invite, and according to the latest reports the security issue may well be near to being fixed for visits.

The gnashing of teeth after these reports from royal sources by the British media has been considerable. Why? Because unless Harry and Meghan are being ?punished? again and again (at least according to THEIR perceptions) these journalists and commentators will never be satisfied.

wannable

#219
April 24, 2022, 03:34:35 PM Last Edit: April 24, 2022, 03:45:11 PM by wannable
The media loves to report on drama, this isn't new and the worst Harry's behaviour and running to the press after meeting with his family goes on, it will be reported, IOW the media will use their journalists as has been to date, the clicks need to come in with the different commentators.

Harry loves and I believe is addicted to the drama.  The media is doing their job. 

Let's be honest, If one was working in the media, entertainment industry, you can't let go of the subject whom is self destructing and putting the noose on his own neck, tighting it by himself.  Sad and ominious et all, but it does bring in the money to whoever reports the madness. AND the BRF just proved to be correct, Harry DID go running to the media as soon as his 'secret' meeting was over.  :lol:

Princess Cassandra

#220
April 24, 2022, 05:24:41 PM
Quote from: wannable on April 24, 2022, 03:34:35 PM
The media loves to report on drama, this isn't new and the worst Harry's behaviour and running to the press after meeting with his family goes on, it will be reported, IOW the media will use their journalists as has been to date, the clicks need to come in with the different commentators.

Harry loves and I believe is addicted to the drama.  The media is doing their job. 

Let's be honest, If one was working in the media, entertainment industry, you can't let go of the subject whom is self destructing and putting the noose on his own neck, tighting it by himself.  Sad and ominious et all, but it does bring in the money to whoever reports the madness. AND the BRF just proved to be correct, Harry DID go running to the media as soon as his 'secret' meeting was over.  :lol:
Losing touch with reality is a sad thing. I feel very sorry about his state of mind, but at the same time I worry about who and what he will bring down with him.

Curryong

#221
April 24, 2022, 06:10:55 PM Last Edit: April 25, 2022, 01:13:08 AM by TLLK
Quote from: Princess Cassandra on April 24, 2022, 05:24:41 PM
Losing touch with reality is a sad thing. I feel very sorry about his state of mind, but at the same time I worry about who and what he will bring down with him.

Running to the media, wannable? Who in the BRF has ever been quoted as saying ?Harry is always running to the media?. Quotes please and which royal said it!

I?ll bet that interview, which as I?ve said, was 99% about publicising the Invictus Games was secured on NBC quite a while before the Games opened. Harry didn?t introduce the subject of the Queen or the RF in the said interview, he was asked about it and then went on with other things. He ignored the question about his father and brother because, as he said, he wanted to concentrate on ?these guys? ie the IG competitors.

Please use the correct user names of our members. Thank you

Curryong

#222
April 24, 2022, 06:35:01 PM Last Edit: April 24, 2022, 06:39:03 PM by Curryong
Prince Harry's Queen protection claim 'may have been sparked by Prince Andrew | Daily Mail Online

Prince Harry?s claims he is making sure the Queen is 'protected' may have been sparked after seeing Prince Andrew escorting Her Majesty to Prince Philip's memorial, Buckingham Palace aides have claimed.

The Duke of Sussex, 37, claimed last week that  he was making sure his grandmother has 'the right people around her' in an interview with US TV host Hoda Kotb from the Invictus Games in The Hague.

Some royal watchers first took his comments as a dig at his father and brother, branding his 'delusional', while others said he may have been taking aim at private secretary Sir Edward Young or her dresser Angela Kelly.

However, insiders at Buckingham Palace have now claimed it was instead aimed at Prince Andrew, who has been embroiled in scandal due to his friendship with late paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein.

A Buckingham Palace source told the Mirror: 'Those images of Prince Andrew escorting the Queen to Westminster Abbey may have upset Harry, which is now believed to be one of the reasons he made such an astonishing remark.



Princess Cassandra

#223
April 25, 2022, 01:07:11 AM
Quote from: Curryong on April 24, 2022, 06:35:01 PM
Prince Harry's Queen protection claim 'may have been sparked by Prince Andrew | Daily Mail Online

Prince Harry?s claims he is making sure the Queen is 'protected' may have been sparked after seeing Prince Andrew escorting Her Majesty to Prince Philip's memorial, Buckingham Palace aides have claimed.

The Duke of Sussex, 37, claimed last week that  he was making sure his grandmother has 'the right people around her' in an interview with US TV host Hoda Kotb from the Invictus Games in The Hague.

Some royal watchers first took his comments as a dig at his father and brother, branding his 'delusional', while others said he may have been taking aim at private secretary Sir Edward Young or her dresser Angela Kelly.

However, insiders at Buckingham Palace have now claimed it was instead aimed at Prince Andrew, who has been embroiled in scandal due to his friendship with late paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein.

A Buckingham Palace source told the Mirror: 'Those images of Prince Andrew escorting the Queen to Westminster Abbey may have upset Harry, which is now believed to be one of the reasons he made such an astonishing remark.
I heard him say in that interview, very near the end of the film clip, that she shared things with him she did not share with others (not the exact quote). I heard it, and the impression I got was that he was trying to stress his importance. Whether or not my impression was correct, he said some very weird, and in my opinion inappropriate, things.  Something is going on, and as he has said that his PTSD has to be managed, I wonder if he is having PTSD episodes now.

Nightowl

#224
April 25, 2022, 03:30:25 AM
The only good thing I can say about the Q and C who fell into this trap, is they had 'hope' of Harry, which he completely destroyed.
? Last Edit: April 21, 2022, 11:38:30 PM by wannable ?

Maybe the Q and C will come to the realization that they will never be able to trust Harry or Meghan ever again, NEVER trust a LAIR for they will stab you in  the back real quick ...as Harry and Meghan have proven.  Such selfish ego manics they have proven to be.         
Print
Go Up Pages 1 ... 8 9 10 ... 15
User actions