Royal Commentators, reporters and authors

[Curryong]

I still think it is prudent to wait until an official report of the ex boyfriend is carried out by a fairly reliable media outlet.

IMO the exes past will be unfavorable, that is all I will say at the moment until it becomes official to discuss.

The group of sussexsquad and johnny depp fans discussing him has significantly reduced too in reference to this subject in the past 48 hours, which was the crucial timing for it to be mentioned in the mainstream media - they didn't because they know what I know - my above sentence #2.

Whatever the ex may or may not be, Dan Wootton is certainly no popular figure with people who read tabloids or watch his sneaky diatribes on TV. People have said what they think of him online over the past four days and it?s not favourable or flattering to him in the least.

And if Wootton finds it liable then he can sue, and then the whole lot can come then out, including any alleged intimidation of colleagues. Looking forward to it!

[wannable]

He is not popular with the same small group of people, which has reduced in the past 48 hours.

Wootton is fine, someone wanted him cancelled - the only thing I can say is they used the wrong person, let's just say the CV is really ugly.

One last thing, why would this small group of people want him cancelled with lies? That speaks more of them rather than him. Nothing to worry about, none of them are too crazy as in dangerous.

As I said, let's be patient the official CV will be out sooner rather than later. The British Media know, waiting for a greenlight from court and blue uniform. That is why Dan is back working from his yearly summer holiday he takes to NZ, another red herring, he always goes, except pandemic years. Like a clock.

[Curryong]

Errors of judgement??? That?s not what I?d call them! ?Sex tapes extraordinaire? is what I would describe his behavior as, lol.

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-66240304

The DM, The Sun and others are now involved and once The Fail and The Scum are involved then other news sources will be gathering near, lol. I thought this only involved ?a small group of people? and ?everything has died down. Seems not!


?Broadcaster Dan Wootton has admitted making "errors of judgement in the past" but denied any criminality as he responded to claims made against him.
Reports have included claims he offered media colleagues thousands of pounds for explicit material of themselves.
Wootton said on his GB News show he was the victim of a "witch hunt" by "nefarious players".
The publishers of the Sun and MailOnline say they are looking into allegations against him.?

And The Guardian also reporting on alleged feline/fish adventures of Mr Holier than Thou as well.

Sun and Mail publishers examine claims against journalist Dan Wootton | News UK | The Guardian

[wannable]

The errors of judgement is several journalism (career) he gossiped about Caroline, Lilly and Amber.

The accusations are very serious, he would be placed on leave as other famous TV presenters, but it didn't happen, because they have the official CV of the accuser.  Dan made his statement, hence two media outlets BBC and The Guardian are reporting about his on air TV statement - take it as a prelude* of what's to come, but not to him, to his accuser - as I said, a very ugly CV.

*A story article to make money, followed by next step of articles related to the case.

Lady C said Dan can't talk because his lawyers are at it, but she can talk as she is unrelated, so basically she blurted out what Dan and his lawyers are doing.

[wannable]

There are allegations from others about his behaviour at work and out of it towards co workers and junior staff  that have appeared on Twitter over the past week that are concerning IF TRUE. Emphasis.
So, sorry, must go and attend to the glass houses outside. Perhaps Wootton is doing the same in NZ. Or having a good hard think about his own behaviour towards others. I wouldn?t think so though, as he has the hide of a rhino. And that at least is not in doubt.

4 days ago ^ this.

Today, The Guardian article Curryong posted says that employees at The Sun, Daily Mail, GBNews were invited since 192 hours ago to come forward and not one, no one has come forward. Not only no one has come forward, The Guardian made an exhaustive investigation and cannot find anything the Very Ugly CV ex is talking about. And that they will keep on trying to find any of the allegations. 

This second comment I am doing it with a purpose, IF you have access/google is our friend, just maybe one can find that very ugly CV and will understand what I'm talking about.

[Curryong]

I know exactly who you are talking about. And not everyone who works/worked at the news organisations were and are willing to speak to other newspapers about it or even their their superiors. However, there are at least three victims of Martin Branning (as he called himself among other aliases) all of them heterosexual and married with children, who have intimated that they are willing to talk to the police about his offers of cash for?..?? and about his constant harassment of them over the phone and e-mails. Is that what Wootton refers to as ?errors of judgement.?

Dan Wootton now knows what it feels like to have an internet ?witch hunt? focused on you. Good. I?m glad. He?s done it to too many people in the past. Sitting in judgement on others with curled lip..

In one of the newspaper articles (in The Independent)  he has apparently stated that it has changed his mind about the sort of journalist he now wishes to be. He stated that he wants to concentrate on big political issues facing the nation. Not personal attacks. So he perhaps has learned a valuable lesson, though I?m not holding my breath!

He has attacked Harry and Meghan, and others, constantly for over the last three years. Three years! And he hasn?t been able to hack five days of people on the Internet (apparently 18 million, mostly unsympathetic) discussing him for less than a week. Most of that week spent with his family. He?s a slimy coward, and an extremely unsympathetic figure. And now he knows it!

As for people like Lady C sticking up for him. She also defended Prince Andrew and his activities. So we know what sort of person she likes and enjoys.

[wannable]

Come on, all the other fallen gays from ITV and the BBC had multiple employees speak out - the usual procedure is a detetive with two police witnesses visit the media outlet, take note, except Dan the Man - Back tracking from the BBC and The Guardian, two media outlets you respect have investigated and spoken to The Sun, The Daily Mail, GBNews and Zero, as in nada.

I'm not saying you, but the majority of the Sussexsquad are angry (because they write tweets with the evidence of being angry and their reasons of being angry) because someone decided to leak a full blown email detailing Megxit to him. I am 99.99% sure the day Dan decides to tell the world WHO leaked it, IMO the squad is going to be very disappointed with their backing of the horse so to speak rather than angry with their usual 'it's the BRF fault'.

Lady C has said there is no bag, no hard drive, it never existed. She also said the police had already received a complaint about the Very Ugly CV ex had threatened to kill Dan - 1 month before the Very Ugly CV decided to go public with One flew over the cuckoo's nest 192 hours ago. The only one who has a criminal record exactly describing Dan as if it was him is the Very Ugly CV ex. There I said it - absolutely every description he gives about Dan's comings and goings IS in the criminal record of the ex. He is a mad man with serious mental health issues.

[Curryong]

The media organisations you refer to are, in their own words, ?undertaking an investigation?. That investigation is ongoing. You expect the Fail, the Scum and GB News etc to immediately cozily sit down with other news outlets about it all.

The Sussex Squad does not consist of over 18 million people. The police have a 28 page document that has been handed to them by a news outlet, which they are taking a look at.  Of course, asking male colleagues for sexual images in exchange for money and using false aliases to do it, may or may not be a criminal offence, however harassment of male colleagues and acquaintances for sex images almost certainly is under certain circumstances. And isn?t that what Wootton or whatever he calls himself, spent hours pontificating about on TV with regard to Huw Edwards and Philip Schofield. Talk about being hoisted on your own petard!

I really really hope that Wootton does have a good hard look at himself and the way he portrays others, instead of inferring that all this is an attack on the TV channel he works for. It isn?t and he knows it. Talk about homelessness and poverty and the NHS and other big issues in the future, and leave others and their private lives alone, crybaby!

And Lady C was constantly at Wootton?s flat at the time of the relationship with Alex, was she? What a load of bs! I would bet my last dollar that her acquaintanceship with Wootton, and that is all it is at best though she infers they are good friends,, only began when Lady C was asked to appear to criticise the Sussexes pretty well every other day on his TV programme. Before that she knew of him and that was it.  And after what she has said about others including the QM, her imagination and judgement are as wonky as a bent coat hanger.

And, repeat,
The Guardian reported Tuesday night that a spokesperson for The Sun's owners, News UK, said: "We are looking into the allegations made in recent days. We are not able to make any further comment at this stage." A spokesperson for Daily Mail owners DMG Media said: "We are aware of the allegations and are looking into them."

[wannable]

Considering the other two gays/multiple people spoke out in 24 hours, this one is going turtle speed.

Related...

Where is your proof? Your taking and talking about an alleged document from a Very Ugly CV ex who has a criminal record, the description of his criminal record - he wants to mirror it on Dan. So basically the ex was stalking Dan, wrote a document stating that Dan was offering bad things to straight colleagues, but there is no colleagues who ever received anything bad from Dan, nor they have known or knew about an alias. But the Very Ugly CV has used several aliases in his own life, his name is not his real name, we will all very likely find out his real name soonish. IF as Lady C said no bag or hard drive ever existed and the Very Ugly CV ex wrote he has all his info based on a unexistent bag/hard drive who has a criminal record, spent time in jail, lives in a rented room strata 2 vs Dan strata 5+. IF you ever get to read the Very Ugly CV ex's record, you will understand what is going on, mirror mirror on the wall...

Lady C is friends with Dan and his entire family. As in dinner gatherings with his entire family. Not sure why this would be bad, in the past family gatherings were a good sign, today bad sign. The World has gone mad.

The Guardian also said they have not found anything to date.

[Curryong]

It is not Alex who has taken a very long document to the police at all. He reported what he had found in the bag to the police  at the time not since. I don?t know why you are persisting in saying all this info coming out on Wootton  is Alex Trudy?s doing, and attacking his past and reputation rather than Wootton?s own alleged behaviour detailed recently by Byline and delivered to the police. Surely you do not condone harassing others and offering money in exchange for stripping off and posing for videos and photos. .

Dan Wootton Reveals ?Regrets? and Claims ?Dark Forces? Attacking GB News in Response to Byline Times? Three-Year Investigation ? Byline Times

[wannable]

Byline Times is tainted, zero evidence. Dis and Mis informers.

Corrupted too. The above story is written by Dan Evans - the same person in Harry's court case that was discovered to have paid people to be witness and dis/mis inform a judge.

Whoever that 'someone' desire to cancel Dan Wottoon, as I said in previous (yesterday) comment, they hired the wrong people with bad records who are tainted. The someone should have hired a straight person, a big son who lives with dad and mom, like the ITV and BBC fallen gays that had straight people with good community records, no criminal records speaking out.

Instead we have tainted people with bad records speaking out with no proof.  :lol:

[Curryong]

Byline Times is tainted, zero evidence. Dis and Mis informers.

Then Wootton can sue them and they can produce the witnesses they have interviewed with names and other details (which were freely given and are in the document) and it will all be interesting in court,  I?m sure.

As for Lady C she met the family at his 40th birthday party which was only recently. Surely such good, close friends as she says she and Dan are would have met nearest and dearest long long before. She is not a long and close friend of Wootton?s and you could tell that by the way she described his birthday party. She certainly wasn?t besties with him when he and Alex were partners.

[wannable]

Why would Wottoon sue them? These people have no money to cover their expenses, one is a prostitute for hire, the other a ex journalist forever damaged by leveson.

IF the tainted people have a problem they can give their information to the police, to the media - the latter can publish it - but they won't because they know exactly what I know the Very Ugly CV ex who has not given any single proof.

IF Dan is going to sue, he will wait to sue people with money, like big media outlets (who publish the nutter alleged 28 page document) with money.

He is not stupid.

[Curryong]

John Cleese may be an anti-woke warrior who is joining GB news very soon but even he is urging British media outlets to discuss the Wootton allegations in full.

John Cleese calls on MSM to investigate Dan Wootton allegations

?Commenting on the matter, comedian John Cleese urged the ?mainstream press? to ?check out? the allegations, saying the media?s failure to investigate the story will be ?final proof of their complete corruption.?

Cleese will soon start hosting a GB News show, which he has previously joked will be for the ?much neglected demographic? of viewers ?who are completely out of touch.?

?If they [the mainstream press] give this the ?Boris?s phone? treatment, it is final proof of their complete corruption,? added Cleese on Twitter, as he retweeted an account promoting the investigation into Wootton.

The story has come to light after similar allegations about Huw Edwards and Philip Schofield were widely reported.?

[wannable]

The others liked to film 🎥 there stuff. Had no boundaries with employees hence they have been retired or canceled. All in a space of 12 hours you know the proof.


Bad luck to the tainted team trying to destroy Dan. They are so bad no proof.

[Curryong]

News UK hires lawyers to look at claims against former Sun columnist | GB News | The Guardian

?The presenter denied any illegal behaviour but he did not directly address whether he had ever sent emails using the name Martin Branning. It is claimed that this pseudonym was used during Wootton?s time at the Sun to approach many serving and former Sun employees with the offer of five-figure sums in return for performing sex acts on camera.

The Guardian has spoken to seven current and former Sun employees who say they received emails from Martin Branning ? understood to be a portmanteau of EastEnders characters Martin Fowler and Max Branning. All claim they were offered large sums of money in return for pictures.? 

And so on it goes. I continue to have huge belly laughs reading of  Wootton?s diatribe about SM pile-ons of others on SM which is evil, and attacks by trolls. He has done nothing but pile on others ?-Caroline Flack who committed suicide, Huw Edwards, the Sussexes, Philip Schofield and many other human beings.

Not so pleasant when it happens to you, is it Dan? Maybe now he?s learned his lesson and will concentrate on what he said he wanted to speak about - ?important national issues not personal attacks on others.? But I won?t be holding my breath.

[wannable]

the Guardian has not been able to independently establish the link between Wootton and Branning

[wannable]

Yahoo has terminated their relationship with Omid Scobie.

That's about USD 115 to 158K a year as a Mid Journalist job.

[Curryong]

Omid and his (correct) opinion of Radar!

https://twitter.com/scobie/status/1681671251712942082?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet

[wannable]

He's pretty much like Radar - caught on court for lying.

[Nightowl]

And that will certainly hurt his bank account, so not good mews for the mouthpiece of the Sussex's.

[Curryong]

And that will certainly hurt his bank account, so not good mews for the mouthpiece of the Sussex's.

As distinct from the mouthpieces of the BRF which consist of 98% of the British media who consistently attack the Sussexes and also 98% of British authors writing on the RF, who have made a very good living taking swipes at either husband or wife or both of them for the past four years. And I?m sure Omid has plenty of other outlets and isn?t crying into his soup about any of it.

[wannable]

The HR/Job site Glassdoor is the best benchmark with salaries, hence my comment of Mid Journalist between 118-150K

After saying that, Omid had a full time with Yahoo, still retains Harpers Bazar. That yearly salary approx. easily pays all services; gas, water, electricity, subscriptions and lots more.

His appearances with ABC and GMA are very very sporadic, almost nil, no information he can provide about the BRF - IMO it is because he broke a BRF news 'embargo', his relations with the BRF also  inexistent after he lied to a court of law, that to me in corporate world/firm is a test, as soon as that happened, Jason Knauf was released from his NDA to prove he lied, which splattered to Harry and Meghan too. A serious company cannot have him in a media pool, aka in the British Monarchy as the royal rota. In a company, the Corporate Media Manager is responsible of the media pool to give out statements, invite the media pool to their events - report, etc.

He is reduced to report on the Sussexes. Anything he states about the Charles, Camilla, William and Kate and the children - depending on what he states, he is in danger of being sued.

He doesn't have to be a propagandist, he can be critical of the BRF, but what I mentioned above is neither, it's several codes he broke. 

[Curryong]

Why has Dan Wootton set up a GoFundMe page appealing for donations, to prevent him being cancelled? I thought he was rolling in money. Now he wants his viewers to bankroll him to the tune of 150,000 pounds, lol? I?ll send him ten Aussie cents. A court case will be worth it for the entertainment alone. Humiliate others and get it back!

[wannable]

^ I think that was or he sent a red herring for 'reactions' ETA: No one - many twitter users official and random seeking it with no avail, including me has been able to find his gofundme page.  Some want to donate, others are curious to find the gofundme proof, nada.

Jay Beecher an independent journalist has said the following:


Jay Beecher
@Jay_Beecher
The police have confirmed to me that they aren't investigating. If the evidence did indeed provide proof that Wootton is behind the emails, they would be investigating. Like I've said, I dislike Wootton, but the Byline Times has a past of printing false information. So far they have published 3 lengthy articles containing graphic claims. If they have proof that Wootton is indeed behind the emails, there's literally not a single reason why they wouldn't be releasing it right now.

^ His twitter feed has literally pages of counter investigation about both parties, but the above is sufficient information to date that the fallacies of the ex or the jailbirds of ByLine Times  had filed with the police is a load of codswallow, is clickbate.  If anyone is interested in the story, follow him in twitter @jay_beecher.