Autumn Kelly -Bride to be

[dizzylizzy13]

According to Wikipedia -- and they are never wrong :P -- she was born on May 3, 1978 -- making her a Taurus Horse and very compatible with Peter (her opposite -- a Scorpio) and HM, who is a Taurus as well, and who is also a Horse- compatible Tiger (as is Princess Anne.) :thumbsup:

[arusha]

Thanks DL:

Oh dear, if she is a taurus and opposite of Peter who is a scorpio (earth / water  signs).

Wouldn't that mean that kate might me compatible with pw as she is a capricorn and him a cancer (another  water/earth sign relationship?)

Oh dear, oh dear, pw might well marry Kate. Oh dear.

[serene grace]

I like this photo of Autumn, she looks pretty, elegant.
http://www.britishroyalwedding.com/2007/11/28/autumn-kelly-the-new-royal-golden-girl/

[rose]

arusha, it's a bit more complicated than that......(but there's no need for you to worry :P )

I think Autumn will make a gorgeous bride. :Jen:

[dizzylizzy13]

Thanks DL:

Oh dear, if she is a taurus and opposite of Peter who is a scorpio (earth / water  signs).

Wouldn't that mean that kate might me compatible with pw as she is a capricorn and him a cancer (another  water/earth sign relationship?)

Oh dear, oh dear, pw might well marry Kate. Oh dear.

What is also disturbing :devil: is that Kate's moon in Cancer is conjunct with both PW's Sun and Moon -- a very favorable aspect according to Carl Jung who studied the charts of many married couples. Also PW's Mars in Libra is trine her Venus in Aquarius (4 signs away) ... which means they'd have the whole Love Shack thing going on as well. :brainwashed:

Peter and Autumn seem pretty well-matched as well ...

[rose]

...but if the man is a cancer and the woman the capricorn the man suffers from her 'coldness' etc... it's not that good. and rooster/dog is quite bad....

[dizzylizzy13]

Which is why a lot of people use this stuff when it suits them and toss it out when it doesn't :laugh: ... according to this, Diana and Charles were compatible, ditto  w/Charles and Camilla, but Elizabeth and Philip are not ... from this we can conclude -- absolutely nothing  :D
From my general POV, the younger and less mature a person is, the more likely they are going to be exactly like their sign ... maybe because the older we are, the likelihood is greater that we have more layers added to our personality and also the ability to comprehend more complexities in ourselves and others. 

[Pri]

I'm afraid I don't ... round AND tapered baguettes? One or the other please, otherwise this looks too much like an anniversary ring for my taste. And Pete, that center diamond can't be bigger than two carats -- c'mon, guy, this is your future wife!  :notamused:

But she is obviously smart and absolutely lovely to look at -- love those dimples!  :flowers:

Thank you Dizzy!! I thought the same thing, but I didn't want to seem like a :snob:

[karla64]

here the quiz of her.... I don't know she had a twin brother  interesting
Let play on Quiz

http://int2.hellomagazine.com/quizzes/royalty-and-statesmen/23-autumn-kelly/

[Cassidy]

Neat, thanks :thumbsup:

[arusha]

I took the quizz and I got only 50%

They quizz you like it's history or geography. Where do they expect you to get all those information  :mad:

like i'm a wizz or something.


Well at least Peter is a lucky fella.  :thumbsup:

[Cassidy]

I only got 50% too. I'm definitely doing it again until I get it all right :laugh:

[rose]

:unsure: they've got a different date of birth... I can't work out her star signs if I don't know the real one...   :cry: ...

[Pri]

You got 60% of the questions correct
Total questions: 10
Correct answers: 6
Not bad... but we're sure you can do better


Her year of birth is a mystery.  I picked 1977 and I got it wrong, but I think Hello!'s got it wrong.

[echo]

^ i thot she was a year or 2 older than peter

[Pri]

I think that's wrong..I think the press reported her birthday inaccurately a number of times.

[arusha]

1975 is the correct answer for her year of birth.

I was surprised myself when they said it's correct. I thought it was 1978. I read sonewhere that it was.

[rose]

I thought it was 1987 as well.

[Lillianna]

1982? But that would make her much younger than William! :)

I also thought that she was a couple of years older than Peter...

[rose]

sorry, typo. I meant 1978. :flower: that's what wiki says.

[AHoch82]

She was born in 1978?

[leogirl]

She was born in May of the year after Peter (six months younger).

[Trudie]

There's one photo in there of her engagement ring... Why's it on her middle finger? shouldn't it be on the ring finger?

It is on her ring finger and it is gorgeous. Now these two are a couple in love. I can't wait to see her as the bride. :thumbsup:

[Trudie]

Or maybe it's the same ring and they've taken the green thing to a whole new level  :teehee:

I prefer Sophie's ring but Autumn's man.  :shrug:

It's not the same on Sophie's ring the two side diamonds are heart shaped.

[buzzlightyear]

God, that Dizzy is such a dufus! How could she not know  :lmao: :lmao: