Liechtenstein referendum rejects curbs on royal powers

Started by Windsor, July 01, 2012, 07:18:49 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Windsor

QuoteThe people of Liechtenstein have overwhelmingly rejected a proposal to curtail the political power of the royal family.

Despite an almost year-long pro-democracy campaign, 76% of those voting in Sunday's referendum said Crown Prince Alois should be allowed to retain his power of veto over decisions made in nationwide ballots.

Crown Prince Alois, who now carries out public duties in place of his father, Prince Hans Adam, has an unusual amount of power for a western European monarch in the 21st century. His powers were even extended, with the approval of the people, in 2003.

Nevertheless, some Liechtenstein citizens, like pro-democracy spokesman Sigvard Wohlwend, insist these powers are simply too great.

"They are certainly the most powerful monarchs in Europe," he said. "The prince of Liechtenstein still has the absolute right to veto any decision taken by the parliament or even the people.

"They have the right to dissolve the government, to dismiss parliament, and no judges can be appointed without the approval of the prince."

BBC News - Liechtenstein referendum rejects curbs on royal powers

:thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

Orchid

That's most surprising news.

I don't know much about the Liechtenstein monarchy at the moment but it sounds like they retain a good degree of absolute power. 

Although from a cursory read of the article there seems to be great similarities between what is listed in this article and the powers retained by the BRF as well.
"Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things."
-Winston Churchil