News, Photos and Chat about Albert & Charlene's wedding - July 2011

Started by marine2109, May 10, 2011, 06:39:06 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.




angieuk

http://www.euronews.net/2011/06/26/monaco-readies-for-royal-nuptials/

http://www.euronews.net/2011/06/27/no-grace-but-plenty-of-style/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=plOeWVf9XXQ&feature=player_embedded

http://www.euronews.net/news/streaming-live/
Euro NEWS SCHEDULE

June 29, 2011: A special about the up-coming events, a portrait of the couple, the wedding preparations, and much more.

June 30, 2011: A long segment about the wedding including who the guests will be, the menu, the wedding dress. Merchandising at the wedding, last minute preparations and an interview with J.M. Jarre.

July 1, 2011: 5pm the civil wedding will be broadcast live from the Throne Room at the Palais Princier de Monaco.

5:50pm: Live balcony appearance the Brass Band will play "Charlene's Anthem" for the first time. Then on the giant screens in the Palais square the AC monogram will appear.

6pm: Live cocktail reception at the Palais square http://www.euronews.net/nocomment/

8pm: Reception at the port http://www.euronews.net/nocomment/

10pm: Jean Michel Jarre concert at Port Hercule http://www.euronews.net/nocomment/

July 2, 2011: Live beginning at 5pm

6:30pm: CET Live-  the driveby through Monaco in their new Lexus.

9pm: Guests arrive for dinner http://www.euronews.net/nocomment/

10pm: Fireworks http://www.euronews.net/nocomment/

July 3, 2011: Re-cap of the entire two-day wedding extravaganza on Euronews. 

Blue Clover



Orchid

Interesting how the Daily Mail are now billing Charlene and Albert's wedding as one which will eclipse Kate and William's: ONLY 2 MONTHS AFTER they billed W&K's as the "wedding of the century".  A prime example of the fickle hype in which the media participates.  It was daft at the time to bill their wedding as such given the number of weddings of billionaires and royals who will be marrying over the next few years/decades which will no doubt be spectacular shows of power, wealth, pomp and pageantry.  Not to mention the exclusion of magnificent weddings which will not make it to the headlines because the people are not celebrities.  Anyway....

The first picture of Charlene HERE is simply THE most spectacularly stunning portrait I have ever seen of any royal/celebrity.  It's utterly incredible!

I'm rather looking forward to seeing the pictures and footage of this ceremony.  I like the way it has received attention but hasn't been over-hyped or saturating the media.  It's been a perfect balance until this point (unlike W&K's which felt like overload).  The location, architecture and scenery is just going to be out of this world, you can just predict.  I hope Charlene's dress is modern with a hint of a classic cut: it would be nice to see the modern woman and the modern institution  reflected throughout the wedding in the choice of dress and setting.
"Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things."
-Winston Churchil



Orchid

 :blink: why would she annul?  What an odd rumour/report to have started to circulate.
"Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things."
-Winston Churchil

Lothwen

Quote from: Orchid on June 28, 2011, 01:10:06 PM
Interesting how the Daily Mail are now billing Charlene and Albert's wedding as one which will eclipse Kate and William's: ONLY 2 MONTHS AFTER they billed W&K's as the "wedding of the century".  A prime example of the fickle hype in which the media participates.  It was daft at the time to bill their wedding as such given the number of weddings of billionaires and royals who will be marrying over the next few years/decades which will no doubt be spectacular shows of power, wealth, pomp and pageantry.  Not to mention the exclusion of magnificent weddings which will not make it to the headlines because the people are not celebrities.  Anyway....

The first picture of Charlene HERE is simply THE most spectacularly stunning portrait I have ever seen of any royal/celebrity.  It's utterly incredible!

I'm rather looking forward to seeing the pictures and footage of this ceremony.  I like the way it has received attention but hasn't been over-hyped or saturating the media.  It's been a perfect balance until this point (unlike W&K's which felt like overload).  The location, architecture and scenery is just going to be out of this world, you can just predict.  I hope Charlene's dress is modern with a hint of a classic cut: it would be nice to see the modern woman and the modern institution  reflected throughout the wedding in the choice of dress and setting.

Orchid :notworthy:

The problem is, the news and entertainment industry like to overuse hyperbole.  Every election is "The most important"  every wedding is "of the century" They really need to dial back, because they make themselves look like fools when they do this.

I think Charlene's dress will be simple, but elegant.  I can't see her in something big and poofy, like Kate.  Kate looked very fairy-tale princess-y, and I think that Charlene will look like a goddess
You may think you're cool, but do you have a smiley named after you?
Harryite 12-005

Okay, fine.  Macrobug is now as cool as I am

Orchid

Right back at ya, Lothwen!   :notworthy: .... 'Hyperbole' is the perfect word to describe the press in all aspects pertaining to royal coverage.  The Daily Mail is the worst offender.  I often wonder why we link to that paper as often as we do.

I think you're spot on. Charlene will likely go for a sleek, "Venus" style dress: something modern, sexily subdued and awe inspiring yet with a slight classic twist.   Kate's dress was very pretty (it was a shame that the best feature - the embroidery - was lost on camera) but it was virtually a copy of Princess Grace's dress which consequently showed little imagination or spectacle in my eyes (subjective of course).  It was quite low key and safe.  I hope Charlene's dress provides a more ravishing and unexpected spectacle in step with the surroundings and opulence that will be on show. 
"Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things."
-Winston Churchil


Orchid

Well well well. I never knew she was African.  What planet have I been living on? :blush:
"Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things."
-Winston Churchil



cinrit

Always be yourself.  Unless you can be a unicorn.  Then always be a unicorn.

blackprincess92


REAL LOVE AT LAST!!!


wannable

QuoteOn with the show: Prince Albert takes bride-to-be on Monaco walkabout days after she 'tried to run away'
Former Olympic swimmer Charlene Wittstock, 33, 'tried to head home to South Africa on one-way ticket'
Monaco ruler drops legal battle to reveal source behind story
New lovechild claim may be made against prince 'within days'


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2009168/Monaco-royal-wedding-Prince-Albert-takes-Charlene-Wittstock-walkabout.html#ixzz1QgkyFIj8   

:eyes:

cinrit

^^ A third one??  But surely she knew about the two?

Cindy
Always be yourself.  Unless you can be a unicorn.  Then always be a unicorn.


blackprincess92

is the prince paying for the whole thing...they have more money than the BRF...so just asking?

REAL LOVE AT LAST!!!


leogirl

Quote from: blackprincess92 on June 29, 2011, 10:40:58 PM
is the prince paying for the whole thing...they have more money than the BRF...so just asking?

I believe so.