Legal muddle let John Lennon drawings

[abc]

Legal muddle let John Lennon drawings escape the law: archives

Apparently he did sexually explicit paintings of him and his wife, which was quite a controversy in the 1970's. (i am not a huge beatles fan so this in itself is news to me) Anyways charges were changed and later thrown out because of the ramminfications. If he was charged then others would have to be too, including the queen.

"I understand that Her Majesty the Queen has some highly erotic work by Fragonard," a 17th-century French painter, Fuller noted.

I found that part funny, I didn't expect someone like her to have any painting like that, but then again its not like the article is saying they are prominetly displayed somewhere she sees them all the time either.

I wasn't sure where to put this but it mentions the queen so what the hey, other british royalty it is.