Royal Commentators, reporters and authors Part 2

Started by TLLK, November 17, 2023, 12:21:56 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

wannable

Neil Sean claims that Omid Scobie made several trips to the same bolthole hotel where Harry goes from time to time, the latter giving him packages.

Apparently both nervous, both avoiding to be seen, both delivering and receiving packages via the concierge. Neil said the package exchanges (more than a dozen times) had to do with Omid's book, avoiding their best to be caught collaborating as in the Finding Freedom - court of law.  They both forgot about public and private CCTV. Yikes.

Nightowl

We have already thought that the Sussex's have their hands all over the books, that is because of what is written about the royal family......you have to actually live with the royal family in their homes daily to get to know them and their habits, so did Omid actually live with the royals, heck NO< Harry and Meghan did that, their DNA is all over the book....

wannable

It's very hard not to associate the trio because they've been caught in a court of law.  They can try to deny it but it's too late - The Boy Who Cried Wolf.

wannable

Everyone would love to see a court battle Piers vs Omid in the 1/15 hacking trial

The other 14/15 is not Piers

How do I know
1 2002
14 2004 to 2009

Piers left the Mirror early 2004.

Curryong

Left?? He was in fact sacked (with immediate effect) in May of that year.

From Wiki

In the wake of the Abu Ghraib torture scandal, Morgan was sacked as editor of the Daily Mirror "with immediate effect" on 14 May 2004, after refusing to apologise to Sly Bailey, then head of Trinity Mirror, for authorising the newspaper's publication of fake photographs.[50] The photos were alleged to show Iraqi prisoners being abused by British Army soldiers from the Queen's Lancashire Regiment.[51] Within days the photographs were shown to be crude fakes. According to official British sources, the photographs were apparently taken in North-West England. Under the headline "SORRY..WE WERE HOAXED", the Mirror responded that it had fallen victim to a "calculated and malicious hoax" and apologised for the publication of the photographs.[52][53] However, Morgan refused to admit that the photographs were faked, and stated that the abuse shown in the photographs is similar to the sort of abuse that was happening in the British Army in Iraq at the time.?

Morgan is the most disgusting and repulsive individual ever to work as a journalist, and that?s saying something. He gives all honest journalists, and there ARE some, a bad name.

wannable

He has been lucky with his career.

I think he really wants a court battle

Curryong

Quote from: wannable on December 17, 2023, 02:42:52 AM
He has been lucky with his career.

I think he really wants a court battle

Lucky? Piers really needs to hope and pray that the Israel/Hamas conflict lasts for several years, as his TV show and the channel that houses it was really really struggling to get a decent number of viewers before it began.

wannable

He has already fulfilled all his career ambitions his rating double of GBNews and Sky News combined or not means nothing at this point. Like after 35 plus years of work several homes. Etc

That man wants his day at a court he stoked the fire back to the trio adage of fire with fire
Piers statement 48 hours ago

Curryong

Quote from: wannable on December 17, 2023, 01:09:02 PM
He has already fulfilled all his career ambitions his rating double of GBNews and Sky News combined or not means nothing at this point. Like after 35 plus years of work several homes. Etc

That man wants his day at a court he stoked the fire back to the trio adage of fire with fire
Piers statement 48 hours ago

Piers isn?t going to sue anybody. And certainly not the judge, who in his judgement set down what he thought of Morgan?s professional reputation!

wannable

He won't, he did his statement returning the ball to their court; the trio.

wannable

Rishi Sunak's Christmas video #Harry you got the wrong number is trending for the third day in a row, with 10 Million views.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1739333181101179108

Yahoo news said the #Harry reference is Harry Cole, political reporter of The Sun - about the PM's phone being leaked

Neil Sean last night said #Harry reference is Prince Harry, ex senior working royal - about Harry stating in court 6 months ago unrelated to his media endeavours that Rishi's government is in ''rock bottom''

It will be interesting any reaction from whichever Harry camp.  The latter is volatile.

Curryong

I doubt very much indeed that the PM would refer to the King?s son as just ?Harry? rather than ?Prince Harry? whatever he thinks of him and certainly not in some televised Xmas skit. Just as he wouldn?t refer to Andrew in such terms either, whatever he thinks of him. It seems to me that the reference was put in there as very much an in-joke that political insiders would savour, than anything else. Neil Sean, as ever, has it wrong again.