Duke and Duchess of Sussex against popular UK tabloids newspaper

Started by sara8150, April 21, 2020, 03:35:14 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages 1 ... 14 15
User actions

Curryong

#350
November 11, 2021, 06:38:13 PM

And with regard to Meghan and the letter to her father her belief that it was possible that Thomas  might leak it still isn?t giving consent to the DM to actually publish the letter, in portions or whole.

If that becomes the intent then no royal correspondence will ever be safe because they all can be leaked. That?s not how copyright works.

Also, Charles actually released a portion of the letters that he sued over and still won. Meghan?s letter to Thomas was a private one discussing their personal relationship and it?s breakdown due to Thomas?s interviews with the media complaining untruthfully of being neglected by her. There is no public interest in that which would override copyright law in England.


wannable

#351
November 11, 2021, 07:10:08 PM
At this point no one cares about the copyrights, especially since the emails and text messages. She (and Harry) are manipulative and very likely compulsive liars.

*****

Tom Wells
@ByTomWells
New details emerge from the Meghan/MoS Court of Appeal case today - revealing just how Jason Knauf came to break ranks to provide his witness statement. At first he adopted a 'strictly neutral' position, court papers show, and declined to help the MoS (cont'd)...

That position remained the same in April 2021, after Meghan had already won summary judgment in the High Court. But at the end of July, the MoS received 'information from a confidential source' indicating Knauf 'regretted not providing a witness statement' (cont'd)...

Knauf by now had changed solicitors from the firm that had previously represented him and three others known as 'the Palace Four'. The MoS then approached him directly. This time he agreed to provide a witness statement - the one that revealed so much yesterday (cont'd)...
Tom Wells

Why is this significant? First, because Knauf's change in position didn't just follow Meghan's High Court victory. It also followed Harry and Meghan's devastating Oprah interview and allegations of bullying made against Meghan. Knauf's departure was announced in May (cont'd)...

Secondly, it raises questions over the identity of the 'confidential source' - the well-informed intermediary - who told the MoS in July that Knauf's 'strict neutrality' was now effectively at an end, and that he 'regretted' his earlier decision not to talk.

Quote
If you look at Jason Knauf?s emails to both Sussexes and the encouragement, support and sympathy expressed in many of them with regards to the letter to Meghan?s father and the communications with the FF authors, it applies equally to him I should think. In fact several epithets come into play with regard to Jason Knauf?s actions and words in the years 2018/19.

It's his job, BUT the couple authorized (s) everything their employees do in their behalf.  Maybe Harry is a bit dense, but MM no way. Too much inventing about their lives eventually, today they are plastered in front page news worldwide about being liars.

It just goes to show that the courtiers and staff DO really exactly what all companies do worldwide, proceed when receiving a written authorization. Good.

Curryong

#352
November 11, 2021, 07:22:21 PM Last Edit: November 11, 2021, 07:30:03 PM by Curryong
The well-placed intermediary? Hmm, let me think, considering that Knauf is still employed by the Cambridges! And snake-like behaviour including being supportive and sympathetic to your employers the Sussexes and then striking back like a viper when it suits you at the right time, is admirable behaviour is it? There may well come a time for JK in the future when he regrets these particular actions on behalf of this newspaper group as well. And the position does not remove the sworn document Knauf presented to the court earlier in front of Justice Warby. It doesn?t negate that at all.

And nobody cares about Tom Wells, journalist for the Sun either.

wannable

#353
November 11, 2021, 07:37:57 PM
IMO I prefer an honest person rather than a lie.  IMO Jason did the right thing. Why would anyone with ''knowledge'' and ''proof'' stay quiet about something evil happening, especially in a court of law?! baffling.

Curryong

#354
November 11, 2021, 07:43:12 PM Last Edit: November 11, 2021, 07:45:38 PM by Curryong
Quote from: wannable on November 11, 2021, 07:37:57 PM
IMO I prefer an honest person rather than a lie.  IMO Jason did the right thing. Why would anyone with ''knowledge'' and ''proof'' stay quiet about something evil happening, especially in a court of law?! baffling.

?Evil? Rather OTT isn?t it with regard to a civil court case on copyright and privacy. I?d say evil is more or less the persecution that the tabloids have been giving Meghan and Harry daily for four years.

Btw, a gorgeous photo of a very loving couple at the gala.

https://mobile.twitter.com/scobie/status/1458585830214225926?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet

wannable

#355
November 11, 2021, 07:47:42 PM
Lies are evil.  People preferring a lie to remain untouched versus a truth isn't good, at the end no favours are being done to the liars, they just get worst in many ways. Small lies that are a pass goes to bigger ones, the bigger it gets, the more ''trouble'' the person is in, so yes it is evil. There's a point in time, like criminals, unwanted persons.

Curryong

#356
November 11, 2021, 07:58:26 PM
A noble sentiment. I take it then that no-one who posts on this forum has ever lied about anything important, either out of forgetfulness, stress, dislike, a desire to have their own point of view out there or just simply keeping the peace with others.

And when was Knauf lying? In front of Warby, to the Sussexes, or now on behalf of the newspaper group with no holds barred? Because you can?t serve two masters.

wannable

#357
November 11, 2021, 08:14:50 PM
He wasn't lying,  he adopted a 'strictly neutral' position, court papers show. He regreted it, good and honest.

Curryong

#358
November 11, 2021, 08:44:09 PM
Quote from: wannable on November 11, 2021, 08:14:50 PM
He wasn't lying,  he adopted a 'strictly neutral' position, court papers show. He regreted it, good and honest.

Well, Knauf certainly isn?t adopting a neutral position now. And let?s hope that in future he doesn?t regret it. There have been plenty of people in the past who have become enmeshed with the machinations of large newspaper groups and cooperated with them who have lived to be sorry.

wannable

#359
November 11, 2021, 09:27:34 PM
Why will anyone regret when there is proof of someone lying?! The only people who may regret stating with proof a lie is IF they are on a court of law against dangerous people (mobsters, gangsters)

Meghan is learning the hard way. Being plastered front page all over the world as a liar  :cry:

TLLK

#360
November 12, 2021, 12:26:52 AM
We've now reached 15 pages on this thread. It's time to close it and open a new one.
Print
Go Up Pages 1 ... 14 15
User actions