Camilla to join Prince Charles in Australia for Commonwealth Games

sandy · April 05, 2018, 10:54:25 AM

Camilla was somebody else's wife from 1973 to 1995.

Camilla already did that, she cooperated with Dahling Junor who raised her to sainthood. Saint Camilla.

royalanthropologist · April 05, 2018, 11:25:54 AM

Hmmm. :hehe:As Diana learnt, that ring on the finger means absolutely nothing if your spouse is in love with someone else. The idea that Charles was with Diana after 1989 is a joke and you know it. He left the marital bed and that was that. If Diana was to be believed, he was emotionally in love with Camilla throughout their marriage. I maintain that Camilla has been Charles' closest companion for over 45 years, both respective marriages notwithstanding. She is hardly going to throw some childish strop at the Commonwealth games because she knows virtually everything about him and loves him as he is. This is just a case of clutching and straws, desperately hoping that the marriage is on the rocks. It is not and will never be. Camilla knows her husband very well and is an expert at keeping his interest in her.

sandy · April 05, 2018, 01:39:42 PM

Oh please Camilla was married to Andrew Parker Bowles from 1973 to 1995 a fact that has nothing to do with what Diana did. She could not be "with" Charles, she was sneaking around on her husband. Charles had many other women and came close to marrying three others pre Diana. Camilla behaved rudely and she did also on the other tour when she giggled at the singers. It shows how rude the woman is. Camilla lives elsewhere and is set for life. When Camilla was providing the heir and spare for Andrew he had a "replacement for her" with married Dale Tryon. Oh what a faithful man your darling Charles was.

dianab · April 08, 2018, 11:16:02 PM

Quote from: royalanthropologist on April 05, 2018, 11:25:54 AM
Hmmm. :hehe:As Diana learnt, that ring on the finger means absolutely nothing if your spouse is in love with someone else. The idea that Charles was with Diana after 1989 is a joke and you know it.

the idea charles was with Diana after 1984 is a joke. i agree...

sandy · April 08, 2018, 11:27:15 PM

They were still married however much it is spun. Harry was born in September 1984 and before he was born, Diana said she and Charles were the closest they'd ever been. It was after Harry's birth that as Diana said "Charles went back to his lady."

TLLK · April 12, 2018, 02:16:31 PM

Prince Charles expresses his love for Australia upon completing his seven day visit to the country ? Royal Central

QuotePrince Charles is said to have been ?really touched? by the number of locals who arrived to greet him as he visited various places across the country.

As reported in SBS News the Prince of Wales expressed: ?I love Australians, and I love coming here.?

His trip saw him visit a National Critical Care and Trauma Centre in Darwin; he laid a wreath at the cenotaph, had food prepared for him by contestants of Masterchef Australia and even had his own welcome ceremony performed by an indigenous community at the sacred site of Mount Nhulun.

Izabella · April 12, 2018, 04:36:27 PM

You mean he expresses his love again for Australia. Shocking! Next year's fluff title will read the same and the same next year after that. :orchid:

wannable · April 16, 2018, 03:48:08 PM

Fantastic, Prince Charles managed to shot down the latest book of the high maintenance, serialized by various tabloids and broadsheet, negatively critisised by the public, and stayed at a 130 per night hotel.

sandy · April 16, 2018, 04:20:56 PM

Shot down? Not everybody buys into what Charles said, who is not all that truthful about what he claims all the time. And it was "out" in other sources before this writer. Even Junor admitted she had cooperation from C and C. The $130 story was obvious damage control. And I can sell some bridges to people who believe he does this all the time.

wannable · April 16, 2018, 04:22:28 PM

The couple actually stayed at the 130 per night hotel! No doubles or clones.

sandy · April 16, 2018, 04:24:09 PM

Not doubting it. But it was obvious damage control. It's not that Charles is not mega wealthy and spends a lot of money. If he wants to show he's thrifty, then maybe he could cut some other expenses like Camilla's maintenance and security watching her house when it's empty.

wannable · April 16, 2018, 04:30:07 PM

Hence fantastic, Charles is gauging media action and public reaction. Not all negative press is worth it, but picking your battles to do some PR correction is fine.

sandy · April 16, 2018, 05:00:17 PM

The royals have a long history of damage control.

wannable · April 16, 2018, 05:31:27 PM

Yes, the firm needs to always be to date with good PR, hence choosing the right battles.

They need the media and public to gauge the good, bag and ugly.

They aren't perfect.

sandy · April 16, 2018, 05:41:51 PM

Charles PR about the hotel is merely a band aid IMO. He already had a reputation for spending a lot of money and being "precious" in his private life. Berrie and Stephen Barry and others confirmed this. Where there's smoke there's fire.