Charles and Diana who cheat first.

Started by Queen Camilla, January 29, 2014, 05:47:55 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Queen Camilla

Charles by all accounts is truthful and doesn't know how to lie.
Diana by all accounts is a liar.

Hewitt said he started his affair with Diana in 1981 or 1982.
Diana said she was unfaith 4 or 5 years into the marriage.
Charles said he wasn't unfaithful until his marriage irretrievable broke down.
Camilla has not had her say.  Words cannot be placed in her mouth by others.

There is no proof that Charles cheated first.

It is just hearsay. 
Some believe Diana, a known liar.
Some believe Charles, a man who doesn't know how to lie.

Princessinwaiting

 :goodpost:

With her lies diana not only ruined charles but her sons lives as well what a dramatic attention seeker

Eri


cinrit

Quote from: Queen Camilla on January 29, 2014, 05:47:55 AM
Hewitt said he started his affair with Diana in 1981 or 1982. 

In 1981, before she married Charles, or after?  In 1982, while she was pregnant with William?  Okay..... :P

Cindy

Always be yourself.  Unless you can be a unicorn.  Then always be a unicorn.

Eri

I think it doesn't matter who cheated first they both cheated and that's the end of it no one is "better" than the other !!!  :orchid: Di was just more attractive and a A class manipulator who knew how to play the press to destroy her husband and as a result the future of her own two children she was a mess !!! She played dirty , she manipulated the press in her favor and yes she LIED that to me takes away everything Chuck might have done to her because she "lowered" to his level if not lower ...

Mike

Quote from: Queen Camilla on January 29, 2014, 05:47:55 AMCharles by all accounts is truthful and doesn't know how to lie.
Are you sure?  "By all accounts."  Who's accounts?
QuoteHewitt said he started his affair with Diana in 1981 or 1982.
Oh, yeah.  This was after he was paid to undergo hypnosis, wasn't it?  How much was he paid?  You can be sure he didn't do it for free.
Mark Twain:
"Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it."
and
"Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please."

Lothwen

[mod] I personally don't like the topic of this thread, so I won't be posting in here, but I will be coming in to check on all of you periodically. Keep it civil, and don't make it personal [/mod]
You may think you're cool, but do you have a smiley named after you?
Harryite 12-005

Okay, fine.  Macrobug is now as cool as I am

sandy

Quote from: Princessinwaiting on January 29, 2014, 07:02:28 AM
:goodpost:

With her lies diana not only ruined charles but her sons lives as well what a dramatic attention seeker

So Charles didn't lie?  The housekeeper in the book said he covered his tracks and pretended to be home when he was off with Camilla.  I saw a documentary and he had affairs with Kanga and Camilla and in the documentary Kanga's husband had to come home late so Charles could be entertained by his wife. If he were so above board and honest he should have told Diana the truth before they got engaged and told her that he wanted Camilla to be part of the arrangement. He wanted to marry Diana for expediency's sake (for the heirs). Charles got jealous of Diana when they first married and she was barely out of his teens. His jealousy was dysfunctional.  What about Charles dramatic attention seeking doing that embarrassing interview in 1994.

So when did Charles become a saint?

sara8150

Prince Charles is first! He been see Camilla lots and Diana don't like that whether wanted kept marriages or still chosen..

Prince Charles had interview in 1994 during Diana was in gallery about Camilla and he ADMIT he slept with Camilla before wedding to Diana in 1981 and numerous times on occasions..

Years later Diana got interview in 1995 about her affairs,bulimia and numerous mores and million viewers watch globes on Diana's interview include Londoners,USA and world watch that and it's so shock..

Reporters comments about wales's interview reviews and HM queen says heard ENOUGH! Comment on review and order divorce in tabloids but Diana was no longer member royal family as HRH she will known as Diana,princess of Wales or princess Diana in public..

Eri

Di did a book behind the people's who provided her luxurious life style back to destroy them back in 1992 ... that is what started it all !!! The Prince never said he had cheated first or when he started cheating ...

Trudie

What is the point of this thread? it appears the person who started it has all the answers already. Though I would like to know how it was possible for Diana to sleep with Hewitt in the period before her wedding and then being pregnant and doing all the engagements and appearances she did with Charles including tours? While not even meeting the man until after Harry was born?.



sandy

Quote from: Eri on February 21, 2014, 07:59:03 AM
Di did a book behind the people's who provided her luxurious life style back to destroy them back in 1992 ... that is what started it all !!! The Prince never said he had cheated first or when he started cheating ...

Diana HAD a luxurious lifestyle, she was from a titled family who were not exactly poverty stricken. She had a trust find that enabled her to buy a flat in London when she was 18. Sometimes luxurious lifestyles don't matter when a person is living in an impossible situation with an emotionally abusive husband and there are witnesses to how Charles would put down Diana.  Charles was a taker not a giver and refused to give up his mistress. Who needs living with a dolt like that no matter how many "luxuries" are involved. And you don't think Charles showed destructive behavior being emotionally abusive to his wife and hanging on to a greedy self serving mistress.  I think Camilla loved the luxuries that Charles bought her and without the perks and $$ he offered her she would not have given him the right time.

FanDianaFancy

Good God, QueenCamilla and Eri,  can you guys  give it  a rest  with  your  biased opinions.
it is the same thing everything.

We  got it!
You are  pro Charles/Camilla. Anti Diana.

Any negative  about her, you take as truth.  We got it the first  hundred times you  both have posted. 

I  will not point errors  such  as  1981? Really?  Hewitt, a cad...did he  say that? How low and how  foolish  and how  uncreditable is he?

Many  of  us, Diana  fans, do NOT take anything  positive  written about her as truth  and any crap written about  Charles and  Camilla   as truth.

PD  is dead and has been over  1`5 years now.

Old story.  Old stuf.  Everything has revealed.  There  is  really  no new news  about PC,PD and Camilla.
Fact  will always  be  that camilla was always there per  PC  need, want, encouragement.
You guys  , and I  won't  cannot  pin  point  exactly where, but you ahve been  off on many  things.
You should read. Learn. try to understnad  how their world worked. They system.
I am not  syaing it is right or wrong but  just how it was and PC   was the last  of  the  heirs  with the mistress.of course, his father had  affairs  so he sort  of grew up in that atmosphere.

Look  up Alice Kreppel. Start there.  From there you can google  English mistresses.
Fascinating  of their  rank. Place. Reason. Perks from laying on their backs and be  descret.
From Camilla  on  back, fascinating.

As  I  have  posted before , Diana was young, foolish,  wanted  her husband to be hers, wanted a real family which she never had.  She  was from the rank and file, but  did not know  how  to play the game. She  was  of  another generation.  She  had  no  older woman  of the rank and file to advise her  as  to  how to  handle the situation. She wanted it  all  and all hers  as in having her legal  husband  be hers and  have a real marriage and family life. THing is, she  did not  know who she married. What made him tick.   How  to work it and handle the situation.

Simply put, she  should  have  bedded  PC   after  wedding him to  have  2-3  kids, heir and two extra spares as women in her position had  done for centuries.  Though of the rank and file, she, like  you guys, did not seem to know  histroy  of the BRF and  rank adn file even though  she was part of it.  too bad she  never,I guess, never studied  the story  and life of Alice Kreppel.  Talk about history repeating itself  with  Camila and PC.  Alice Kreppel adn Cmailla's ancestors  must be thrilled  on the other side  of how she got them back in the  rank and file at the highest  place of the nobility.  Diana  should  have studied, been advised...
find a lover  amoung  her rank and  file to call her  own.   Make her own life  as PC and C had  done. Own friends  of the rank and file  as  protetors as  Pc and C  had. Safe houses  too.  Romance  is nice.  Let PC and C  be. Maybe it  would have played itself  out and over  by  late  1980's and she  would  be  alive today..maybe. Married  to PC...perhaps. In her  place. Maybe they  would  have  found  each other.


It  is  all, waht it was and  is  now.
Sad. Sad that she died  as her final ending. The final chapter.
After that, the rest is history.
It is very interesting. As  people have said, you  could not have written a  good novel like this. Shakespeare  could  not have written a story  with so many  plots,twists,  etc.

Eri

^ And what did she do to have her husband all for herself and have a stable family life trying to kill herself in front of him because he was on the phone , painting books behind his back to destroy him , lie , cheat didn't help would you agree? Di herself said she had 50% to be blamed for the marriage failing!!!

FanDianaFancy

Yes, PD did say  she  was 50%  blame and for anyone, that seems fair  in   ruined marriage.
She also  said there were three of them in marriage and it was a boit crowded. Seems ttrue too. Many  marriages  break up when  the girl  does not leave her mother or the guy does not leave hsi mother. Many  mothers  have ruined their  kids  marriage by  being all in . Of course, this is by request, with encouragement, a need and want by thier  sons or daughters.

Likewise, PC NEVER gave up his  closer  than  close and at least  menatlly, eomitonaly,  convenient  friendship with Camilla. NEER. The marriage never had  a chance.  PC  never gace it a chance.
PD  , an immature  chid-woman then, throwing herself ,crying, fighting,  trying,   spying on PC, going after him to be hers,  was NOT the answer. Like I said, and I am not, NOT  upholding  affairs, being with a married amn, but  PD, even though from the rank adn file, went about  it  all WRONG!! She  had neither the tools, age, knowledge, sense of  self, no elder  femal  figure to guide her, tell her what  to do in their world.
Instead of reading Barbara  Cartland romance novels, she should have read  history   on her  world ,  rank and file of the nobility, her ancestors, her world.
PD held all the cards as the  legal wife and  face  of the monrachy adn mother of the princeses.

She should paraded her love  for PC in the press adn  looked always adoring at him, and behind the scene given him permission  to  be with Camilla.  Find a man of her own from the rank and file and  call it a life in private. Fight fire with fire  as the  saying goes.

The end, it is , was sad, unbelievable still,that she died  as she did.  Death  ends  the story.

If she were alive, still,PC and C would have married. But PD  would  be  there. Alive. Showing up  in her  sons' lives. Being there to enjoy them.
She  would ahve  won the war and Camilla would have won the battle.

As it is, Camilla, won it all.  Won it by default. Great luck  befall Camilla. Some people are  just lucky, yet we make  our choices good and bad and we  all have results  of those choices.  Yes, Diana  made huge mistakes  by  not taking a  security team  .Not thinking.   Not having  good advisors. Real advisors. 

It  is  all sad and always  will about her dying dying as she did.
It set  everything else and everyone in motion   for their lives. Life  is  like that. Some things  , others choices, ours, can  set  some things  .

Eri

^ The biggest mistake Di made is marry a man who she knew loved another woman to the point at her wedding she dramatically looked at Camilla (she knew what was up) and think it would all be alright and have fits when she found out the hard truth ... but I wouldn't credit Cam with all the fault of the marriage falling apart  the ones who were married to each other were Chuck and Di ...

sandy

Eri, do you honestly think Prince Charles told Lady Diana when he proposed that he loved another woman? Neither Charles nor Diana claimed this so it simply is not true.

It's  the old story, the woman "asked for it"when a man lies to her.

Diana told Morton she thought C and C were "over" at the time of the marriage and she thought Charles was honorable and would be faithful to her and truly give up Camilla.

And you think Camilla had nothing to do with their marriage issues? Then I have a bridge to sell you. The woman sent Charles little gifts on his honeymoon, that should give you some clue.

Limabeany

Quote from: Eri on March 11, 2014, 08:20:28 PM
^ The biggest mistake Di made is marry a man who she knew loved another woman to the point at her wedding she dramatically looked at Camilla (she knew what was up) and think it would all be alright and have fits when she found out the hard truth ... but I wouldn't credit Cam with all the fault of the marriage falling apart  the ones who were married to each other were Chuck and Di ...
Diana was 19 and Charles and Camilla were old lovers in their 30s. I credit Camilla and Charles with duping a very young 19 year old.
"You don't have to be pretty. You don't owe prettiness to anyone. Not to your boyfriend/spouse/partner, not to your co-workers, especially not to random men on the street. You don't owe it to your mother, you don't owe it to your children, you don't owe it to civilization in general. Prettiness is not a rent you pay for occupying a space marked 'female'." Diana Vreeland.

Mar

Age? really, that can't be the whole of it

the way I see it is that Charles wanted his marriage to work and had Camilla's blessing, but Diana was to naive (not because of her age) to actually think she was going to have a fairy tale life with an adoring husband by her side, but Charles' love is himself so he was focusing on himself the same way he has always done ( and Camilla knows this, accept it, and even likes) so, Diana turned out to be too demanding and pushy, so that drove Charles away from her, because let's face it, you are not going to convince a prince, a spoiled prince that he stops acting like so, even if he is in his 30's and you wish him to settle down: not going to happen.

So it was only natural that he went looking for Camilla again, since she pleases him 100%

fair to Diana and the kids? NO, but that's the way it IS

I expect my husband to behave like a man, but if my husband has been a spoiled Crown prince all his life, I wouldn't count on it.



If Diana hadn't been so demanding, MAYBE they would still be married today

Princessinwaiting

 :goodpost: :goodpost:

But I would say there is more to it than that , Diana was 19 ..so? Still an adult .what if Camilla had been 19 and diana in her 30 ' s the situation would still be Saint diana lol I feel she was too attention seeking and pushy a lot of friends have said the same thing heck even   some biographers have I think she had certain mental problems that also led charles away from her .

Mike

#20
Nothing new here, but . . .

Diana read a lot of romance novels and probably developed an unreasonable expectation of marriage with her fantasy boyfriend, Prince Charles.  She had a crush on him since her early teens and thought he was "Mister Perfect."  He was Prince of Wales, how could he be anything different?

Some might say because of her teenage emotions and expectations she walked into her own minefield.  The subsequent actions of Charles and Camilla ensured she got hurt.  As Sarah Bradford put it, "Basically, the cause of Diana's affliction was not only post-natal depression after the birth of William, but her early realization that Charles did not truly love her and that this marriage in which she had invested so much hope could never approximate to her romantic dreams."
Mark Twain:
"Patriotism is supporting your country all the time, and your government when it deserves it."
and
"Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please."

Mar

Princessinwaiting let's prepare for all the bashing from the Diana fans   :hide:


I agree with you Mike

Eri

Apart from the fact she married when she was 20 if she was old enough to marry him she was old enough to handle him ... her greedy family didn't think she was too young when they threw her at him ...

Mar


sandy

#24
Quote from: Eri on March 13, 2014, 04:22:58 PM
Apart from the fact she married when she was 20 if she was old enough to marry him she was old enough to handle him ... her greedy family didn't think she was too young when they threw her at him ...

Oh yes, a 20 year old can outmaneuver two thirty somethings, both who have been around the block quite a few times. In your dreams. Diana did not have the experience C and C had so no, it was no level playing field.

Nobody "threw" Diana to him. Charles willingly, of his own free will courted her, proposed to her, and marry her. Honestly to defend Charles  he is made to look like a helpless child when he was a grown man. More free passes for Charles.

Double post auto-merged: March 13, 2014, 04:55:47 PM


Quote from: Princessinwaiting on March 13, 2014, 03:37:24 PM
:goodpost: :goodpost:

But I would say there is more to it than that , Diana was 19 ..so? Still an adult .what if Camilla had been 19 and diana in her 30 ' s the situation would still be Saint diana lol I feel she was too attention seeking and pushy a lot of friends have said the same thing heck even   some biographers have I think she had certain mental problems that also led charles away from her .

Diana was a nervous young woman barely out of her teens when she went on her first walkabout as a married woman in Wales. I didn't see anything pushy about her. And the public took to her which Charles was too stupid and jealous and childish to appreciate.

I wonder if your relative or close friend was in Diana's situation you would feel the same contempt for her for "asking for it" or "she should have known better." This is an excuse used for men who are abusive to their wives BTW. The wife "asked for it." Diana went into the marriage in good faith. Charles did not. He should have kicked the greedy mistress to the curb if he wanted a marriage with Diana. He obviously wanted to have it all.

And the mental problems accusations come from Penny Junor who loves Charles and is in no position to diagnose a cat. Diana had bulimia and got it under control but the Diana bashers go to great length to portray her as "mad" so Chuck can get another free pass.  Junor is the biographer who said she had "mental problems."  I guess you are a great reader of  her Diana bashing books.

Charles IMO needed help but felt himself too perfect to seek it. In his authorized biography, he passed on the blame for his own bad choices to everybody but himself. The Diana was mad spin comes directly from his sympathizers Nicholas Soames, Penny Junor and most likely Camilla herself.