Baby Lady Louise

FtLouie34 · November 27, 2003, 10:06:25 PM

http://www.hellomagazine.com/royalty/2003/...incesscaroline/

riley · November 27, 2003, 11:54:31 PM

Louie-
The title of the post has to do with baby Lady Louise. The post has to do with Princess Caroline become a UN Goodwill Ambassador. Where's the connection? I'm confused.
Cheers.

kitkat · November 28, 2003, 12:37:46 AM

Riley, she must have had too many crack-filled eggs!!

FtLouie34 · November 28, 2003, 02:01:33 AM

OK yeah my bad. Here's the link:

http://hellomagazine.com/royalty/2003/11/2.../27/ladylouise/

LadyLove · November 28, 2003, 06:39:39 AM

I wonder why they didn't want HRH for their kid. I can see why Anne didn't want it but why them? Its not like they haven't used their titles enough!!! (i do love them to death, but its the truth)

I also just read somewhere that Charles supposedly was asked if Mountbatten could be used in the surname and he and diana refused!!! that kind of makes me mad. It SHOULD be used. Its tradition.

kitkat · November 28, 2003, 07:08:17 AM

If it is true that Charles and Diana refused, there might be a legitimate excuss. Perhaps Diana wanted Spencer to be part of their childrens name and it wasn't allowed. If they weren't allowed that name why should she allow another name to be added. I'm probably completely wrong, but that was the only thing I could think of. I just feel that they had their reasons if, indeed, they wouldn't allow Mountbatten as part of the princes names.

Also, when I read the article it said that Prince Philip warmly recived the child reciving Mountbatten as part of his grandchilds name. That to me makes me think that it's not tradition. How do you know that it is tradition?

QuoteI wonder why they didn't want HRH for their kid. I can see why Anne didn't want it but why them? Its not like they haven't used their titles enough!!! (i do love them to death, but its the truth)

Because the HRH would make the child, too, distinctly different from other kids, and even though the HRH name isn't attached to her name doesn't mean she can't use the fact that she is part of the royal family.

LadyLove · November 28, 2003, 07:48:00 AM

Well, I didn't mean tradition of the royal family. I meant "regular" tradition. :)

CountessJayne · November 28, 2003, 09:27:04 PM

:huh:

I thought according to some document, the heir apparent would get the surname Windsor, and the rest of the sovereign's children would be Mountbatten-Windsor. So since Charles is the heir apparent his last name is Windsor, as is the last name of Wills and Harry. *shrugs* maybe i'm wrong...

QuoteWell, I didn't mean tradition of the royal family. I meant "regular" tradition.

I'd like to have that sort of tradition. I'd like a hyphenated name. Unless whoever I marry is too much of an influential public figure...which i doubt...haha, but good point, Lady Love.

wills_gurl0824 · December 01, 2003, 12:43:47 AM

actually harry has the Mountbatten-Windsor on his name. idk y wills wouldn't and harry would but hey! go figure. i got it from this website http://yorkgirls.20fr.com/family.html its a page on the website.

LadyLove · December 01, 2003, 01:37:37 AM

:o that has to be a typo, the article i read stated that none of Prince Charles children would carry that name.

kitkat · December 01, 2003, 02:14:58 AM

Actually, I read, sometime after I read this thread, that William, too, has the name Mountbatten.

LadyLove · December 29, 2003, 08:53:52 AM

Does anyone know how she's doing? When is her christening supposed to be?

stewie_griffin · December 30, 2003, 01:53:23 AM

I haven't heard anything about her in a while. Apparently, she's doing well. No idea when her christening is supposed to be.

LadyLove · December 30, 2003, 04:03:37 AM

:mellow: What are they going to do, wait until she starts school to give her a christening? HA! That would be mean.

princessrose · December 30, 2003, 04:30:41 AM

Quote:mellow: What are they going to do, wait until she starts school to give her a christening? HA! That would be mean.

Oh I believe her christening is very soon :angelic:
It?s comforting to know that she is doing well though

LadyLove · December 30, 2003, 04:46:22 AM

Yeah it is :)

sara1981 · January 02, 2004, 05:27:07 AM

you know Prince Edward and Sophie will decide when christening maybe this month or February im not sure! if Sophie will return to public for duty! or she will stay home with baby for 6 weeks wait find out see what-ups!

Sara Boyce

princessrose · January 06, 2004, 02:17:32 AM

http://www.itv.com/news/261730.html

stewie_griffin · January 06, 2004, 02:56:19 AM

That's good to know.

LadyLove · January 06, 2004, 01:10:05 PM

:D Thats great.

princesscharmingolas · January 09, 2004, 04:44:52 AM

And! We're going to get pictures soon!Family photographs of The Earl and Countess of Wessex with Lady Louise Windsor

There really are no photos yet. THat's just the announcement.

LadyLove · January 09, 2004, 02:57:01 PM

QuoteAnd! We're going to get pictures soon!Family photographs of The Earl and Countess of Wessex with Lady Louise Windsor

There really are no photos yet. THat's just the announcement.

Yay! :) I want to see what she looks like, lol.

sara1981 · January 09, 2004, 03:26:46 PM

i cant wait see the baby at christening! her baby looks fab!

Sara Boyce

FtLouie34 · January 13, 2004, 03:21:13 PM

http://www.hellomagazine.com/royalty/2004/.../12/ladylouise/

kwanfan · January 16, 2004, 08:18:48 PM

Thanks for the link. :)