Author Topic: Queen wouldn\'t stand side to let Charles take her duties makes him Prince Regent  (Read 225 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sara8150

  • Diana-ites
  • Aristocrat
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,682
  • Activity:
    8%
    • Favorite royal: Princess Diana&Kate,Duchess of Cambridge
Queen will NOT stand aside to let Charles take her duties: Officials seek to quash rumours monarch will make him Prince Regent
Queen will not stand aside to let Charles take her duties | Daily Mail Online


Double post auto-merged: August 20, 2017, 09:27:04 PM

Queen will not abdicate throne for Prince Charles declaring 'the nation comes first'
The Queen will NOT abdicate throne for Prince Charles | Royal | News | Express.co.uk
« Last Edit: August 20, 2017, 09:27:05 PM by sara8150 »
 


Offline royalanthropologist

  • Aristocrat
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,522
  • Activity:
    24%
  • Fair and Balanced...to an extent
    • Favorite royal: Camilla Shand, Duchess of Cornwall
Ah the good old double dipping technique to rile up the gullible and ignorant. Put out a fake unfounded story based on "sources". Then a few weeks later put out another denouncing the same story, once again based on "sources".
"In the past, people were born royal. Nowadays, royalty comes from what you do"...Gianni Versace
 
The following users thanked this post: TLLK

Offline TLLK

  • Forum Royalty
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,892
  • Activity:
    98%
  • Gal power!!!!!!
^^^Gotta get those readers to click away!
 


Offline SophieChloe

  • Moderator
  • Forum Royalty
  • *****
  • Posts: 13,160
  • Activity:
    0%
Most of these stories come from the DM @TLLK.  You yourself also post links.....    :shrug:

Double post auto-merged: August 21, 2017, 03:22:47 AM

Ah the good old double dipping technique to rile up the gullible and ignorant. Put out a fake unfounded story based on "sources". Then a few weeks later put out another denouncing the same story, once again based on "sources".
"Gullible" and "ignorant"?  Really?  How about enough of paying for this nonsense? Time to get shot of them all.
« Last Edit: August 21, 2017, 03:22:47 AM by SophieChloe »
Fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me
 
The following users thanked this post: TLLK

Offline TLLK

  • Forum Royalty
  • *****
  • Posts: 12,892
  • Activity:
    98%
  • Gal power!!!!!!
 :lol: Thou speakest the truth! @SophieChloe  However you would be amazed at my restraint when it comes to many of their articles.  :wink:
 

 

Royal Insight Forum is not responsible for the content of external sites