Empress Matilda (Maude)

Started by Rani, February 14, 2011, 10:56:00 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Rani

How different do you  think England would be today if she had been crowned Queen of England?

http://www.middle-ages.org.uk/queen-matilda.htm



Lothwen

Wow, I had never heard of her.

So, if she wasn't proclaimed "Queen" of England, who ruled?   
You may think you're cool, but do you have a smiley named after you?
Harryite 12-005

Okay, fine.  Macrobug is now as cool as I am

Rani

Her cousin, Stephen de Bois. 
QuoteMatilda's father, King Henry I of England, died in 1135. Matilda was ready to take her place as Queen of England. Neither English nor Normans had ever been ruled by a woman, and Queen Matilda, the Empress Maude, as she called herself, was a proud, disagreeable, ill-tempered woman, whom nobody liked.

The barons who had vowed to support the accession of Matilda to the throne reneged and Stephen, Matilda's cousin, seized the throne. Some of the barons and noblemen then turned on Stephen and invited Maude to come and be crowned in his stead. She came very willingly; and her uncle, King David of Scotland, set out with an army to fight for her; but all the English in the north came out to drive him back; and they beat him and his Scots at what they call the Battle of the Standard, because the English had a holy standard, which was kept in Durham Cathedral.

Stephen was taken prisoner at a battle at Lincoln, and there was nothing to prevent Maude ( Matilda) from being queen but her own bad temper. She went to Winchester, and was there proclaimed; but she would not speak kindly or gently to the people; and when her friends entreated her to reply more kindly, she flew into a passion, and it is even said that she gave a box on the ear to her uncle, the King of Scotland, who had come to help her, for reproving her for her harsh answers. When Stephen's wife came to beg her to set him free, promising that he should go away beyond the seas, and never interfere with her again, she would not listen, and drove her away. But she soon found how foolish she had been.

Stephen's friends would have been willing that he should give up trying to be king, but they could not leave him in prison for life; and so they went on fighting for him, while more and more of the English joined them, as they felt how bad and unkind a queen they had in the Empress. She was so proud and violent, that her husband would not come over to England to help her, but stayed to govern Normandy. She was soon in great distress, and had to flee from Winchester, riding through the midst of the enemy, and losing almost all her friends by the way as they were slain or made prisoners.

Her best helper of all, the Earl Robert of Gloucester, was taken while guarding her; and she could only get to his town of Gloucester by lying down in a coffin, with holes for air, and being thus carried through all the country, where she had made everyone hate her. Stephen's wife offered to set the Earl free, if the other side would release her husband; and this exchange was brought about. Robert then went to Normandy, to fetch Maude's little son Henry, who was ten years old, leaving her, as he thought, safe in Oxford Castle; but no sooner was he gone than Stephen brought his army, and besieged the Castle, that is, he brought his men round it, tried to climb up the walls, or beat them down with heavy beams, and hindered any food from being brought in.

Everything in the castle that could be eaten was gone; but Maude was determined not to fall into her enemy's hands. It was the depth of winter; the river below the walls was frozen over, and snow was on the ground. One night, Maude dressed herself and three of her knights all in white, and they were, one by one, let down by ropes from the walls. No one saw them in the snow. They crossed the river on the ice, walked a great part of the night, and at last came to Abingdon, where horses were waiting for them, and then they rode to Wallingford, where Maude met her little son. There was not much more fighting after this. Stephen kept all the eastern part of the kingdom, and Henry was brought up at Gloucester till his father sent for him, to take leave of him before going on a crusade. Geoffrey died during this crusade.

Matilda had no further desire to be queen, but lived a retired life in a convent, and was much more respected there than as queen.



Lothwen

Was the fact that she was so ill-tempered the only thing keeping her from being crowned?  I would think that the idea that a woman had never ruled by herself would have factored into people not trusting that she could do the job. 
You may think you're cool, but do you have a smiley named after you?
Harryite 12-005

Okay, fine.  Macrobug is now as cool as I am

Rani

^I think it was both.  Honestly, I think she sort of embodied the stereotype- you know, a woman who lets her emotions rule her and can't keep a cool head about her



Lothwen

I wonder if Elizabeth I was aware of her when she was crowned queen, and that's why her public persona was as carefully crafted as it was? 
You may think you're cool, but do you have a smiley named after you?
Harryite 12-005

Okay, fine.  Macrobug is now as cool as I am

LouisFerdinand

Stephen was more popular than Matilda. She was viewed by most of the people as a foreigner.


Curryong

^ Matilda's extreme arrogance also put off many of the Barons and others who would have been her potential supporters.

LouisFerdinand

If Matilda had been Queen, would her husband Geoffrey, Count of Anjou have insisted on being crowned King of England?


Curryong

Those were dreadfully tempestuous years. If Mathilda had been completely acknowledged as the rightful Queen and ruler of England by everyone and therefore there would have been a peaceful accession and Coronation it's possible that Geoffrey would have asked for that.

Whether the Queen herself, who seems to have been a very determined, obstinate and extremely proud woman, would have looked kindly on his demands and agreed is another matter! Not to mention the Barons, many of whom had trouble accepting her on the throne!

Mathilda was no Victoria, looking up to her husband as guide, protector and fount of all knowledge. Now, if you had asked 'Would Victoria have liked Albert to be crowned as King and co ruler'? I would have said 'Yes' immediately! But the times were completely different.

amabel

I think it would still have been expected that he as her husband would be crowned.. which was one reason why the Englsih DIDN'T want a woman ruler.  Because her husband was bound to want to be King, or to Rule over her, and it was his right as a husband to rule over her.. so how could she be Queen when she ahd a husband who was officialy or unofficialy King.

LouisFerdinand

If Matilda, the daughter of King Henry I, had become Queen of England, would her husband, Geoffrey, Count of Anjou, have become King?


Curryong

No, because he was the Queen's husband and consort. And Mathilda wouldn't have allowed that anyway. She was in charge, and their marriage was tempestuous. The couple's eldest and only surviving son was the heir. If Geoffrey had been allowed to be King at a time of Civil War (the war with Stephen which took up almost all of Mathilda's reign) then any offspring from his second marriage, had he survived Mathilda, would have been heirs after Henry. Not allowed!

LouisFerdinand



LouisFerdinand

King Henry I commanded the nobles to swear an oath before God accepting his daughter Matilda as his rightful successor. Henry made them swear four times: in 1127, 1128, 1131, and 1133.